Focused on providing independent journalism.

Wednesday, 17 December 2014

Major winter storm targets Japan; heavy rain, snow, typhoon strength winds


© MTSAT/UW-CIMSS on December 16, 2014.



Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) said a rapidly developing low-pressure mass is expected to bring heavy rain, snow and strong winds which will affect almost entire Japan on Tuesday and Wednesday, December 16 and 17, 2014.

Heavy storm conditions, high waves, floods, disruption of transport system and avalanches are expected as a result.


JMA called for particular readiness in Hokkaido for potential violent snow storm of magnitude seen "once in a few years". Maximum instantaneous winds reaching 108 - 126 km/h (67 - 78 mph) are forecast nationwide except for Okinawa, Amami and some other regions.


The Kuril Islands will see wind gusts eclipse typhoon strength and could approach 130 - 160 km/h (80-100 mph) Tuesday night and into Wednesday.


According to the JMA, two low-pressure masses, one over the Sea of Japan and the other over Honshu, are expected to grow fast and move northeast on Tuesday, eventually forming an atmospheric pressure distribution typical to winter over Japan. (JT)


The two masses will converge Wednesday over Hokkaido and grow further, creating a situation that will cause a strong cold airstream to continue to move toward Japan until Thursday.


[embedded content]




Meteorologist Robert Speta of the WestPacWx said heavy rainfall could trigger localized flooding on Japans Pacific coast. This storm acts a lot like the sea effect snow event we seen this past weekend in Tohoku and Hokoriku.

"To put it in perspective this storm will have a deeper pressure and stronger gradient than the one on March 4, 2013 that killed nine in Japan," he said.



© MTSAT/JMA Infrared image on December 16, 2014.

Two low-pressure masses converging



Want something else to read? How about 'Grievous Censorship' By The Guardian: Israel, Gaza And The Termination Of Nafeez Ahmed's Blog


Young Turks host Cenk Uygur blasts 'Orwellian prick' Cleveland cop justifying Tamir Rice shooting: 'For Christ's sake, be a human for a second'


© YouTube

'' host Cenk Uygur



host Cenk Uygur blasted Cleveland Patrolmen's Association head Jeffrey Follmer on Tuesday for his insistence that the shootings of Tamir Rice and John Crawford by local officers were justified.

"Just, for Christ's sake, be a human for a second," Uygur said. "And say, 'We're so sorry that [a] 12-year-old kid died, man. Obviously we didn't mean that.' Is that too hard to say? Is that too hard to say - 'We didn't mean to kill your 12-year-old son. We're so sorry about that.'"




Uygur showed footage of Follmer telling MSNBC host Ari Melber on Monday that Officer Timothy Loehmann was justified in shooting and killing Rice last month, citing footage of the fatal encounter that showed Loehmann killing Rice just two seconds after pulling up near him at a local park.

"The male's action spoke for itself," Follmer said. "The video clearly shows, and by the officers' statement, that they were justified in the deadly force." Later he added, "This shooting was tragic, but it was justified."


Follmer also said to Melber, "How about this? Listen to police officers commands, listen to what we tell you, and just stop. I think that eliminates a lot of problems. I have kids too, they know how to respect the law. They know what to do when a police officer comes up to them."


"You killed him in two seconds - [Rice] didn't have time to listen to what you said," Uygur said in response. "This Orwellian prick; we just saw the video, we've seen the video a million times. You pull up and you shoot him. You pull up and you shoot him. One-one thousand, two-one thousand and he's dead."


Records show that Loehmann joined the Cleveland police force after being declared unfit for duty while working for the department in suburban Independence, Ohio.


His deputy chief there, Jim Polak, described Loehmann as "just not mentally prepared to be doing firearm training" and found that he "could not follow simple directions" after having to be escorted from a live fire area after having an "emotional meltdown."


Follmer has also criticized Cleveland Browns wide receiver Andrew Hawkins for wearing a shirt saying, "Justice for Tamir Rice and John Crawford" before his game this past Sunday. But WJW-TV reported that Cleveland Police Chief Calvin Williams distanced the department from those remarks on Tuesday.


"It is important to note that the comments made by Mr. Folmer do not represent the views of the Cleveland Division of Police," Williams said in a statement. "The Division of Police respects the rights of individuals to peacefully demonstrate their personal views and opinions. Mr. Hawkins was certainly well within his rights to express his views and no apology is necessary."


Watch Uygur's commentary, as posted online on Tuesday, below.


[embedded content]


Want something else to read? How about 'Grievous Censorship' By The Guardian: Israel, Gaza And The Termination Of Nafeez Ahmed's Blog


Antibiotic resistant superbugs may claim millions of lives and cost trillions by 2050


There is no question that antibiotics have lent a helping hand in treating various ailments, but now this modern medicine is fueling an issue that was perhaps never considered before. Since their introduction, antibiotics have slowly been fueling the development of superbugs - bacteria that are completely resistant to our conventional treatments. In fact, a recently released report says that superbugs could claim 10 million lives each year as well as $100 trillion by 2050.

Economist and head of the Review on Antimicrobial Resistance, Jim O'Neill says that the trend of growing infections resistant to drugs, which are already killing hundreds of thousands of people across the globe every year, is set to get worse unless we do something now.


O'Neill said:




"Drug-resistant infections already kill hundreds of thousands a year globally, and by 2050 that figure could be more than 10 million. The economic cost will also be significant, with the world economy being hit by up to 100 trillion US dollars (£63.6 trillion) by 2050 if we do not take action.


We cannot allow these projections to materialise for any of us, especially our fellow citizens in the Bric (Brazil, Russia, India and China) and Mint (Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria and Turkey) world, and our ambition is such that we will search for bold, clear and practical long term solutions."







The first paper from the Review on Antimicrobial Resistance, chaired by economist Jim O’Neill found 700,000 deaths across the world each year are attributed to resistance to antimicrobials – a class of drugs that includes antibiotics, antivirals, antiparasitics and antifungals.






By 2050 the report estimates that number could soar to 10 millions if urgent action is not taken.



The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had even openly admitted recently that the age of antibiotics is coming to an end as super-bacteria take over. The CDC's threat report notes that antibiotic prescriptions have led to the death of more than 23,000 Americans every year and the calamitous emergence of super bugs that are impervious to our scientific 'medicines.' Even the 23,000 annual deaths is being called conservative.

Coming to the same findings, even more recent research from Harvard scientists reveals that we must find alternatives to antibiotics if we want to stand a chance against these super bacteria.


Professor Dame Sally Davies, chief medical officer for England, said the latest research is 'compelling'.




"We all know that antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is important. This is a compelling piece of work, which takes us a step forward in understanding the true gravity of the threat. It demonstrates that the world simply cannot afford not to take action to tackle the alarming rise in resistance to antibiotics and other antimicrobial drugs we are witnessing at the moment.


I look forward to the ideas that Jim will recommend in due course for how we can begin to turn this tide globally."




Here are some bacteria that are already proving to be resistant to conventional medicine:

  • Klebsiella pneumonia - a form of bacterial pneumonia associated with klebsiella pneumoniae



  • Escherichia coli (E.coli) - which can cause serious food poisoning



  • Staphylococcus aureus - a common cause of skin infections, respiratory disease and food poisoning





The report predicts that the world economy will be hit by up to 100 trillion US dollars (£63.6 trillion) by 2050 if we do not take action.



Professor Anthony Kessel, director for International Public Health at Public Health England, said:

"If ever we needed a reminder of what a public health catastrophe looks like, then this has to be it. Stopping resistance developing should be straight forward: prescribing the right antibiotic for the right infection for the right time and stopping infections spreading by practicing good infection control.


However, in reality this can be difficult to achieve, particularly in countries where antibiotics are freely available or there is lack of sanitation and healthcare is limited. For bacteria, the development of resistance to antibiotics is a natural evolutionary process in terms of survival."



[embedded content]


Want something else to read? How about 'Grievous Censorship' By The Guardian: Israel, Gaza And The Termination Of Nafeez Ahmed's Blog


Fireball seen shooting across the sky over Colorado

Fireball

© KOAA5



A possible fireball was seen west of Colorado Springs above Mountain Shadows around 5 p.m. Tuesday. The picture was sent to News5 by viewer, Lisa.

Meteorologist Stephen Bowers said it's likely a meteor. He said, "There are reports of this being seen around Denver, too.


It's actually under review by the American Meteor Society to see if it can be classified as a fireball."


Stephen tells us the Geminids meteor shower hit its peak last weekend, but we could still see some meteors linger. The Geminids is one of the more active meteor showers each year, known for slow-moving, bright meteors.


Want something else to read? How about 'Grievous Censorship' By The Guardian: Israel, Gaza And The Termination Of Nafeez Ahmed's Blog


Cop holds man at gunpoint who was speeding home to assist wife in labor


© Shutterstock



A Cleveland-area man said he was held at gunpoint, ticketed and threatened despite explaining to a police officer that he was speeding home to help his wife, who has a high-risk pregnancy, give birth Northeast Ohio Media Group reported.

"Officer Robinson approached me yelling at me to put my hands up and holding me at gunpoint as if I was threatening his life," Samuel Taylor said of the encounter. "His finger was on the trigger."


According to WKYC-TV, Taylor's wife, Katie, sent him a text message last Friday morning asking him to come home from work because she was in labor. Taylor said he was traveling at 38 mph in a 25 mph zone when he passed Cleveland Heights Police Officer William Robinson in his patrol vehicle.


Robinson started following Taylor, and signaled for him to pull over. But because he was "literally about six or seven houses" away from his home and street parking was blocked by other vehicles, Taylor said, he slowed down and pulled into his driveway, at which point Robinson allegedly approached him with his gun drawn.




Taylor said he spent the next 20 minutes explaining the situation to Robinson, and offered to let the officer follow him into the home if he holstered his weapon. Instead, the officer allegedly told him to stay in his car while he went to the home. At that point, Taylor said, he called the police department, and was threatened with felony charges by an unidentified lieutenant.

Meanwhile, Katie Taylor met Robinson at the door and confirmed her husband's story.


"My wife said, 'I need my husband to come here,'" Samuel Taylor said. "'I'm going into labor. Please tell me what is going on. I need help.'"


Police Chief Jeffrey Robertson told WKYC that Robinson only had his gun drawn for two minutes during the encounter, then holstered it after "evaluating the situation." Robertson also said that the officer arranged for a city ambulance to take the Taylors to the hospital.


The couple drove themselves to the hospital, instead, where Katie Taylor delivered a boy. Though the child, Jonah, was born healthy, Katie Taylor was briefly hospitalized for complications surrounding the pregnancy. Both have reportedly been allowed to return home. Samuel Taylor was cited for speeding and failure to yield for an emergency vehicle.


"Upon initial review we are comfortable that the officer followed CHPD protocol appropriately and he conducted himself in a professional manner," Cleveland Heights City Manager Tanisha Briley said regarding the incident.


Want something else to read? How about 'Grievous Censorship' By The Guardian: Israel, Gaza And The Termination Of Nafeez Ahmed's Blog


Torture report leaves no doubt - Bush Administration guilty of war crimes


© Eric Draper / The White House via

A handout photo of CIA Director George Tenet, center with President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney in the Oval Office, Washington, March 3, 2003



Reading the 499-page torture report just released by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence was a disgusting experience. Even after many years of writing books and articles about the Bush torture policy, I was unprepared for the atrocious pattern of crimes our government committed against other human beings in our name.

One of the most hideous techniques the CIA plied on detainees was called "rectal rehydration" or "rectal feeding" without medical necessity - a sanitized description of rape by a foreign object. A concoction of pureed "hummus, pasta with sauce, nuts and raisins" was forced into the rectum of one detainee. Another was subjected to "rectal rehydration" to establish the interrogator's "total control over the detainee." This constitutes illegal, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment and a humiliating outrage upon personal dignity.


Several detainees were waterboarded, a technique whereby water is poured into the nose and mouth to cause the victim to think he's drowning. One detainee in CIA custody was tortured on the waterboard 183 times; another was waterboarded 83 times. Waterboarding has long been considered torture, which is a war crime. Indeed, the United States hung Japanese military leaders for the war crime of torture after World War II.


Other "enhanced interrogation techniques" (EIT) included being slammed into walls, hung from the ceiling, kept in total darkness, deprived of sleep - sometimes with forced standing - for up to seven and one-half days, forced to stand on broken limbs for hours on end, threatened with mock execution, confined in a coffin-like box for 11 days, bathed in ice water, dressed in diapers. One detainee "literally looked like a dog that had been kenneled."


The executive summary of the torture report was made public, but the 6,700-page report remains classified. The summary depicts the CIA at best, as keystone cops, at worst, as pathological, lying, sadistic war criminals. The CIA lied repeatedly about the effectiveness of the torture and cruel treatment. Interrogations of detainees were much more brutal than the CIA represented to government officials and the American public.


Bush's CIA directors George Tenet, Porter Goss and Michael Hayden should be charged with crimes, along with their minions who carried out the torture.




Obama Violates Constitutional Duty

In light of the gruesome revelations in the torture report, it is high time President Barack Obama fulfilled his constitutional duty to enforce the law. The US Constitution states the president "shall take care that the laws are faithfully executed." Yet Obama refuses to sanction prosecutions of those responsible for the torture.


The report documents torture and cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment, all of which violate US and international law. The War Crimes Act punishes torture as a war crime. The Torture Statute (Statute) provides that whoever "outside the United States" commits or attempts to commit torture shall be imprisoned for not more than 20 years "and if death results to any person from conduct prohibited by this subsection, shall be punished by death or imprisoned for any term of years or for life."


The statute defines torture as an "act intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering upon another person within his custody or physical control."


When the United States ratified the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, and the Geneva Conventions, we promised to prosecute or extradite those who commit or are complicit in the commission of torture. A ratified treaty is part of US law under the Constitution's Supremacy Clause. Yet the Obama administration persists in its refusal to bring the culprits to justice.


On January 11, 2009, nine days before Obama was sworn into office, George Stephanopoulos of ABC News confronted the newly elected president with the "most popular question on your own website, change.gov"- whether Obama would investigate torture by members of the Bush administration. Obama responded:



"I don't believe that anybody is above the law. On the other hand, I also have a belief that we need to look forward, as opposed to looking backward . . . At the CIA, you've got extraordinarily talented people who are working very hard to keep Americans safe. I don't want them to suddenly feel like they've got to spend all their time looking over their shoulders, lawyering up . . . "



Now we know that many of those people at the CIA were using their extraordinary talents to devise new and more horrific ways to torture, humiliate, degrade and mistreat the people under their control.

To his credit, shortly after he was inaugurated, Obama signed an executive order banning torture. But hunger strikers at Guantánamo are still force-fed, a practice that violates the Torture Convention, according to the UN Committee Against Torture (CAT).


In 2009, US Attorney General Eric Holder ordered an investigation headed by veteran prosecutor Assistant US Attorney John Durham. But, two years later, Holder announced that his office would investigate only the deaths of Gul Rahman and Manadel al-Jamadi, who died while in CIA custody. Holder said that the US Department of Justice had "determined that an expanded criminal investigation of the remaining matters is not warranted." With that decision, Holder made clear that no one would be held accountable for the torture and abuse except possibly for the deaths of Rahman and al-Jamadi.


Ultimately, the Obama administration gave a free pass to those responsible for the two deaths. Rahman froze to death in 2002, after being stripped and shackled to a cold cement floor in the secret Afghan prison known as the Salt Pit. Al-Jamadi died after he was suspended from the ceiling by his wrists, which were bound behind his back. Military police officer Tony Diaz, who was present during al-Jamadi's torture, said that blood gushed from his mouth like "a faucet had turned on" when he was lowered to the ground. A military autopsy determined that al-Jamadi's death was a homicide.


Nevertheless, Holder said that "based on the fully developed factual record concerning the two deaths, the department has declined prosecution because the admissible evidence would not be sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt."


Torture is Who They Are


After the report was made public, the White House issued a statement calling the CIA interrogation program "harsh" and the treatment "troubling" - a study in understatement. Obama said that torture "is contrary to who we are."


But torture is who President George W. Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice are. Under the well-established doctrine of command responsibility, commanders are liable for war crimes if they knew, or should have known, their subordinates would commit them and they did nothing to stop or prevent it.


In 2008, ABC News reported that the National Security Council Principals Committee consisting of Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld, Tenet and Ashcroft met in the White House and micromanaged the torture of terrorism suspects by approving specific torture techniques such as waterboarding. Bush admitted in his 2010 memoir that he authorized waterboarding. Cheney, Rice and Yoo have made similar admissions.


Indeed, Cheney recently admitted on Fox News that Bush "was in fact an integral part of the interrogation program, and he had to approve it." Cheney added, "We did discuss the techniques. There was no effort on our part to keep him from that." Karl Rove told Fox News that Bush was "intimately involved in the decision" to use the EIT. Rove said Bush "was presented, I believe, 12 techniques, he authorized the use of 10 of them, including waterboarding."


Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Rice should be should be prosecuted for their crimes.


The Senate report contains example after example of why "the use of the CIA's enhanced interrogation techniques was not an effective means of obtaining accurate information or gaining detainee cooperation." It says: "Multiple CIA detainees fabricated information, resulting in faulty intelligence . . . on critical intelligence issues including the terrorist threats which the CIA identified as its highest priorities." Yet the CIA continually lied that the EIT "saved lives."


The Legal Mercenaries Should Be Prosecuted


The report says the Department of Justice's (DOJ) Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) relied on the CIA's numerous misrepresentations when crafting OLC memos authorizing the techniques.


But the report gives OLC lawyers, including Deputy Assistant US Attorney General John Yoo (now a law professor at Berkeley) and Assistant Attorney General Jay Bybee (now a federal appellate court judge), free passes by failing to connect the dots leading to their criminal responsibility as war criminals.


The OLC's infamous "torture memos" contain twisted legal reasoning that purported to define torture more narrowly than US law allows. The memos advised high Bush officials how to avoid criminal liability under the War Crimes Act.


Yoo, Bybee and company knew very well that the techniques the CIA sought to employ were illegal. Their August 1, 2002, memo advised that attention grasp, walling, facial hold, facial slap (insult slap), cramped confinement box and the waterboard passed legal muster under the act. They knew these techniques constitute torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, in violation of the Torture Statute, and the Torture Convention.


The Torture Convention is unequivocal: "No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat or war, internal political instability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture." In light of that clear prohibition, the OLC lawyers knew that "necessity" and "self-defense" are not defenses to torture. Whether the CIA was being forthright about the necessity for, or effectiveness of, the techniques was irrelevant to the faulty legal analysis in the torture memos.


Moreover, after the report was released, Cheney told : "The program was authorized. The agency did not want to proceed without authorization, and it was also reviewed legally by the Justice Department before they undertook the program."


Bush's attorneys general, Alberto Gonzales, John Ashcroft and Michael Mukasey, who oversaw the DOJ, should be criminally charged, together with the OLC's legal mercenaries.


The report also fails to connect the dots to the Pentagon. In December 2002, Rumsfeld approved interrogation techniques that included the use of dogs, hooding, stress positions, isolation for up to 30 days, 20-hour interrogations, deprivation of light and sound, using scenarios to convince the detainee that death or severely painful consequences are imminent for him and/or his family, and using a wet towel and dripping water to induce the misperception of suffocation.


And the report gives short shrift to the extraordinary rendition program, where detainees were illegally sent to other countries to be tortured. The report refers to "renditions," which are conducted with judicial process. But detainees were rendered to black sites in Syria, Libya and Egypt in order to avoid legal accountability.


No Impunity


"The individuals responsible for the criminal conspiracy revealed in [the Senate] report must be brought to justice and must face criminal penalties commensurate with the gravity of their crimes," according to Ben Emmerson, the UN Special Rapporteur on Counter Terrorism and Human Rights. And the UN's CAT said the Obama administration has failed to investigate the commission of torture and punish those responsible, including "persons in positions of command and those who provided legal cover to torture."


A special prosecutor should be appointed to investigate those from the CIA, the DOJ, and the high officials of the Bush administration who violated, or aided and abetted the violation of, our laws banning torture and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment. The full 6,700-page Senate report should be declassified.


But Obama said, "Rather than another reason to refight old arguments, I hope that today's report can help us leave these techniques where they belong - in the past." Yes, these crimes were committed in the past. Crimes are always prosecuted after they are committed. Obama should be reminded of his constitutional duty to enforce the law.


If we don't bring the offenders to justice, they could eventually get their due when other countries prosecute them under "universal jurisdiction." Some crimes are so atrocious that countries can punish foreign nationals, the way Israel tried, convicted and executed Adolph Eichmann for his crimes during the Holocaust, even though they had no direct connection to Israel. Emmerson also said, "Torture is a crime of universal jurisdiction. The perpetrators may be prosecuted by any other country they may travel to."


The following grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions constitute war crimes punishable under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), when committed as part of a plan or policy: torture, willful killing, inhuman treatment, and willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health. The Senate report documented instances of willful killing (death); great suffering (hysterical, asking to die, attempts at self harm); and serious injuries (placed on life support, hallucinations) caused by the EIT. Yoo admitted in his 2006 book that the denial of Geneva protections and coercive interrogation "policies were part of a common, unifying approach to the war on terrorism."


Although the United States is not a party to the ICC, other countries could prosecute US nationals under universal jurisdiction for the core crimes in the Rome Statute.


Obama declared, "Hopefully, we don't do it again." But Obama's hopeful sentiments won't do the trick. The only way to prevent others from using torture and cruel treatment in the future is to bring those responsible to justice. We must send a message to would-be torturers that they will not enjoy impunity for their crimes. Torture has no statute of limitations.


In light of the torture report, the responsibility for the US targeted killing program - by drones and manned bombers - should be removed from the CIA, which cannot be trusted with such awesome responsibility.


Indeed, the entire targeted killing program should be the subject of the next congressional report. Anticipating the imminent release of the torture report, Obama stated, "We did a whole lot of things that were right," after September 11, "but we tortured some folks."


The Bush administration did torture some folks. But we are still doing other things that are not right. The Obama administration has avoided adding detainees to the Guantánamo roster by illegally assassinating them without judicial process. For this, members of Team Obama should also find themselves as criminal defendants someday.


Want something else to read? How about 'Grievous Censorship' By The Guardian: Israel, Gaza And The Termination Of Nafeez Ahmed's Blog


'Mindfulness' defined by Jon Kabat-Zinn


© Jon Kabat-Zinn CBS NEWS



Anderson Cooper reports on what it's like to try to achieve "mindfulness," a self-awareness scientists say is very healthy, but rarely achieved in today's world of digital distractions.




The following is a script from "Mindfulness" which aired on Dec. 14, 2014. Anderson Cooper is the correspondent. Denise Schrier Cetta, producer. Matthew Danowski , editor.

Our lives are filled with distractions -email, Twitter, texting we're constantly connected to technology, rarely alone with just our thoughts. Which is probably why there's a growing movement in America to train people to get around the stresses of daily life.


It's a practice called "mindfulness" and it basically means being aware of your thoughts, physical sensations, and surroundings.


Tonight, we'll introduce you to the man who's largely responsible for mindfulness gaining traction. His name is Jon Kabat-Zinn and he thinks mindfulness is the answer for people who are so overwhelmed by life, they feel they aren't really living at all.


Jon Kabat-Zinn: There are a lot of different ways to talk about mindfulness, but what it really means is awareness.


Anderson Cooper: Is it being present?


Jon Kabat-Zinn: It is being present. That's exactly what it is.


Anderson Cooper: I don't feel I'm very present in each moment. I feel like every moment I'm either thinking about something that's coming down the road, or something that's been in the past.


Jon Kabat-Zinn: So ultimately all this preparing is for what? For the next moment, like the last moment, like, and then we're dead (laugh) so in a certain way...


Anderson Cooper: Oh God, this is depressing.


Jon Kabat-Zinn: Are we going to experience while we're still alive? We're only alive now.


Jon Kabat-Zinn, is an MIT-trained scientist who's been practicing mindfulness for 47 years. Back in 1979, he started teaching mindfulness through meditation to people suffering from chronic pain and illness. That program is now used in more than 700 hospitals worldwide.


Anderson Cooper: So how can you be mindful in your daily life?


Jon Kabat-Zinn: When your alarm goes off and you jump out of bed, what is the nature of the mind in that moment? Are you already like, "oh my God," your calendar pops into your mind and you're driven already, or can you take a moment and just lie in bed and just feel your body breathing. And remember, "oh yeah, brand new day and I'm still alive." So, I get out of bed with awareness, brush my teeth with awareness. When you're in the shower next time check and see if you're in the shower.


Anderson Cooper: What do you mean check and see if you're in the shower?


Jon Kabat-Zinn: Well, you may not be. You may be in your first meeting at work. You may have 50 people in the shower with you.


Kabat-Zinn says mindfulness takes practice...a lot of people start with a training class to learn how to meditate.


He agreed to teach us at a weekend retreat on a remote mountaintop in northern California.


When we arrived we were told there would be no television to watch, no Internet, not even an alarm clock.



© Anderson Cooper CBS NEWS



[Congressman Ryan: So I'm checking in.]

The retreat was full of professionals - neuroscientists, business leaders, Silicon Valley executives.


Before we began we all had to surrender our last ties to the outside world.


Jon Kabat-Zinn: Put your devices in the basket. I'm contributing my MacBook Air and my iPhone. Happily.


I wasn't exactly happy to give up my phone. I usually check emails several times an hour.


[Kabat-Zinn ringing a bell.]


Jon Kabat-Zinn: So let's take a few minutes and just settle into an erect and dignified posture.


The retreat lasted three days and most of that time was spent just sitting there, silently meditating - with occasional guidance from Kabat-Zinn.


Jon Kabat-Zinn: There's no place to go. There's nothing to do. We're just asking you to sit and know that you are sitting.


Knowing that you're sitting may sound simple...turns out...it's not. The mind constantly wanders.


Jon Kabat-Zinn: The mind has a life of its own. It goes here and there.


To not get lost in thought, Kabat-Zinn recommended focusing on the sensation of breathing in and out.


Jon Kabat-Zinn: Can we actually ride with full awareness on the waves of the breath -- at the belly, at the nostrils and the chest. And then simply rest here in awareness.


"Resting in awareness" is one of those phrases used a lot by people who practice mindfulness. But when I tried to do it, it wasn't restful and I worried I wasn't doing it right. I kept thinking about work.


Anderson Cooper: I miss my cell phone. I'm having withdrawal, I must say.


Kabat-Zinn, who has written 10 books on mindfulness and led nearly a hundred retreats, describes meditation as a mental workout.


Jon Kabat-Zinn: The mind wanders away from the breath and then you gently and nonjudgmentally just bring it back.


Anderson Cooper: So it's okay that the mind drifts away but you just bring it back.


Jon Kabat-Zinn: It's the nature of the mind to drift away. The mind is like the Pacific Ocean, it waves. And mindfulness has been shown to drop underneath the waves. If you drop underneath the agitation in the mind, into your breath deep enough calmness, gentle undulations.


After hours of meditating in 30-minute sessions it does get easier. Those waves of thought Kabat-Zinn described - they're still there but you get less distracted by them.


At breakfast, we spent time relearning some of the very basic things in life - including how to eat food. Eating a meal in complete silence is a little awkward, but without conversation as a distraction...you taste more and eat less.


This is something called "walking meditation." The goal is to learn to be aware of each and every movement and feeling. I know it seems ridiculous, but it does change the way you experience walking.



© Walking meditation CBS NEWS



Jon Kabat-Zinn: The Zen people from Ancient China, "When you're walking, just walk." It turns out to be the hardest thing.

Anderson Cooper: That's an ancient saying?


Jon Kabat-Zinn: When you're walking, just walk. When you're eating, just eat. Not in front of the TV, not with the newspaper. It turns out, that's huge.


Congressman Tim Ryan, an Ohio Democrat, says mindfulness might look a lot like nothing, but he really believes it can change America for the better.


He attended his first meditation retreat in 2008, just days after winning a grueling reelection campaign.


But being mindful at a retreat is one thing, we wondered if, back in Washington, Congressman Ryan ever worries about how all this looks...


Tim Ryan: Well, you know, I can see myself in high school going, "Whoa. Stay away from those guys." (laugh)


Anderson Cooper: So, how do you use it here on Capitol Hill?


Tim Ryan: I'm on the budget committee, for example. There's a lot of conflict. And people say things that get you ramped up. I find myself, as my body clenches up when somebody says something that I know is wrong or I-- I wanna catch them in a lie or whatever, that just, "Calm down. When it's your turn, you make your point."


[Ryan in Congress


Tim Ryan: Hey man.]


You don't hear the words "calm" and "Congress" together very often, but Ryan is trying to change that. He hosts weekly meditation sessions open to members and staff of both parties.


[Mindfulness leader: Now shifting the attention to take in the entire body.]


Anderson Cooper: Have you gotten any Republican Congressmen in to meditate with you yet?


Tim Ryan: No. [laugh] We're working on it.


He's written a book about mindfulness and obtained a million dollars of federal funding to teach it to school children in his Ohio district.


[Tim Ryan with kids in classroom


Girl: I feel like we are calm right now.


Tim Ryan: Yes you are.]


Tim Ryan: I've seen it transform classrooms. I've seen it heal veterans. I've seen what it does to individuals who have really high chronic levels of stress and how it has helped their body heal itself. I wouldn't be willing to stick my neck out this far if I didn't think this is "The Thing" that can really help shift the country.




Anderson Cooper: To some people though this may sound like kind of New Age gobbledygook?

Jon Kabat-Zinn: Yeah, there's so many different compelling studies that are showing that this not New Age gobbledygook, this is potentially transformative of our health and well-being psychologically as well as physically. It can be useful for anxiety, depression, stress reduction.


There have been a number of studies that show mindfulness can lead to those benefits, as well as improvements in memory and attention.


And, at the University of Massachusetts, Judson Brewer, a psychiatrist and neuroscientist, uses mindfulness to treat addiction.


Judson Brewer: This is just the next generation of exercise. We've got the physical, you know, exercise components down. And now it's about working out how can we actually train our minds.


Dr. Brewer is trying to understand how mindfulness can alter the functioning of the brain.


He uses a cap lined with 128 electrodes.



© Anderson Cooper CBS NEWS



Judson Brewer: We going to start filling each of these 128 wells with conduction gel.

The electrodes are able to pick up signals from the posterior cingulate, part of a brain network linked to memory and emotion.


Judson Brewer: This is all just picking up electrical signal from the top of your head.


Since attending the mindfulness retreat, I'd been meditating daily and was curious to see if it had an impact on my brain.


Judson Brewer: We're going to have you start with thinking of something that was very anxiety provoking for you.


Anderson Cooper: OK.


When I thought about something stressful, the cells in my brain's posterior cingulate immediately started firing -- shown by the red lines that went off the chart on the computer screen.


Judson Brewer: Just drop into meditation.


Anderson Cooper: OK.


When I let go of those stressful thoughts, and re-focused on my breath...within seconds the brain cells that had been firing quieted down -- shown by the blue lines on the computer.


Anderson Cooper: That's really fascinating to see it like that.


Dr. Brewer believes everyone can train their brains to reach that blue, mindfulness zone, but he says, all the technology we're surrounded by makes it difficult.


Judson Brewer: If you look at people out on the street, if you look at people at restaurants, nobody's having conversations anymore. They're sitting at dinner looking at their phone, because their brain is so addicted to it.


Anderson Cooper: You really think there's something in the brain that's addicted to that?


Judson Brewer: Well, it's the same reward pathways as addiction, absolutely.


Anderson Cooper: I'm on mobile devices all day long. I feel like I could go through an entire day and not be present.


Judson Brewer: And what's that like?


Anderson Cooper: It's exhausting.


Judson Brewer: So all of this is leading to a societal exhaustion.


The irony is, many of the people responsible for creating the gadgets that distract us are themselves practicing mindfulness. More than 2,000 people from companies like Google, Facebook and Instagram showed up earlier this year in San Francisco for a mindfulness conference called Wisdom 2.0.


[Announcer: Please welcome our guests.]


Karen May is a Google vice president, and that's Chade-Meng Tan a former engineer whose become kind of a mindfulness guru. And as could only happen at a place like Google, his actual title is "Jolly Good Fellow."


Chade-Meng Tan: Which nobody can deny.


Anderson Cooper: So, what does a Jolly Good Fellow do?


Chade-Meng Tan: My job description is to enlighten minds, open hearts and create world peace.


Anderson Cooper: That's your job description?


Chade-Meng Tan: That's my job description.


Anderson Cooper: I've heard that at some meetings at Google you actually start out with moments of silence.


Karen May: We do.


Anderson Cooper: How long do sit there quietly for?


Karen May: It's literally a minute or two of noticing your breathing, calming yourself down, being present. And then you're able to go into the meeting, the business at hand, with a little bit more focus.


Anderson Cooper: Does it make people more productive?


Chade-Meng Tan: Yes, it does. When the mind is un-agitated, when the mind is calm, that mind is most conducive to creative problem solving.


Anderson Cooper: --to innovate?


Chade-Meng Tan: Correct. And one of the powers of mindfulness is the ability to get to that frame of mind on demand.


So along with their free health clubs and other company perks...Google now offers their 52,000 employees free lessons in mindfulness.


Chade-Meng Tan: In the middle of stress, when everything is falling apart. You can take one breath.


Anderson Cooper: I can imagine some people rolling their eyes and saying, "Oh, come on, of course, like, you know, at Google, you guys have tons of money, there's massage therapists walking around and all sorts of nice things for employees, but it just doesn't seem practical."


Karen May: The advantage of this is it actually doesn't cost anything and it doesn't take much time.


Anderson Cooper: And you believe it really works?


Karen May: I absolutely believe it works.


After nearly four decades of teaching mindfulness, Jon Kabat-Zinn is happy to see it hitting the mainstream. But if you're starting to think mindfulness is something you should start practicing, he says you may be missing the point.


Jon Kabat-Zinn: It's not a big should. It's not like, "Oh I gotta, now one more thing that I have to put in my life. Now I have to be mindful."


Anderson Cooper: And if it becomes that one more thing they gotta do after they take the yoga class?


Jon Kabat-Zinn: They shouldn't do it. Just don't do it. Don't do it. It's not a doing at all, in fact, it's a being. And being doesn't take any time.


About the author


Anderson Cooper, anchor of CNN's "Anderson Cooper 360," has contributed to 60 Minutes since 2006. His exceptional reporting on big news events has earned Cooper a reputation as one of television's pre-eminent newsmen.


This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.

Want something else to read? How about 'Grievous Censorship' By The Guardian: Israel, Gaza And The Termination Of Nafeez Ahmed's Blog