Focused on providing independent journalism.

Friday, 23 January 2015

The folly of endless growth: Sooner or later, real physical and environmental limits apply


© Arthur Cofod / Pictures Inc./Time Life Pictures/Getty Images



Central banks around the globe have taken us all into unchartered territory, where the possible paths boil down to a binary outcome: either it all works out or it doesn't.

Unfortunately, the 'it all works out' outcome has a very low probability of actually happening; so the binary outcome isn't equally weighted like a coin toss. By 'working out', here's what the central banks all striving (praying?) for:



  • Inflation of 2% to 3% per year

  • Economic growth of at least 6% per year (nominal) and a real (inflation adjusted) rate of 3% per year.


The reason that the central banks want all of this growth and inflation isn't because it's good for you, me, or anybody we know. Instead, the bankers need it because that's what our exponential money system requires.

Slaves To The System


It bears repeating, inflation is not rising prices -- those are of inflation -- but instead is the expansion of the existing stock of money and credit. If we observe the symptom of 'rising prices', then that means the underlying mechanism of expansion of credit (mainly) and money (less important because the money supply is a only fraction of the volume of credit) is functioning.


Think of it this way: it's like the central banks want a slightly feverish patient and so they track the patient's temperature. They tell everyone that 100 degrees, perhaps 101, is the perfect temperature...slightly elevated, but not too much. But the patient's temperature is merely a . The underlying for having an elevated temperature is having too many foreign bodies living within the patient, like having too much money and credit in an economic arena.


With increasing levels of credit in our monetary system, the system functions reasonable well and enough new loans are being made to service both the principal balances of prior loans plus their interest payments. But with stagnant or falling levels of credit, the exact opposite is true and the entire financial system slips into collapse mode.





We are now in service to our system of money, not the other way around. That is, we have a money system to which we are now slaves. It's either expanding or collapsing, but has no stable state; no easy equilibrium that it can inhabit.

The tragedy in all this is that we can easily have a different system of money that does not make such unreasonable demands of us. But virtually nobody in power is (yet) discussing this idea.


The Folly Of Endless Growth


Getting back to the central bank wish list, nominal GDP of at least 6% with real growth of 3% allows governments to expand their debt loads by 3% per year without them ever getting larger in proportion to the underlying economy. That way, they never have to be paid back. They only grow larger, and this means more borrowing/credit in the system which is part of requirement #1, above.


So the entire central bank playbook, in slavish devoted service to an obviously dysfunctional system of money, boils down to endless credit growth coupled to endless economic growth.


Endless growth. When you hear of how central bankers are 'battling deflation' or 'seeking price stability of at least 2% inflation', just think to yourself What they really want is endless growth.


The next thought you should have is


The answers, clearly, are No and NO!


Every day, we have further confirmation of the idea that the world has limits and that economic growth requires more resources. Water, soil, fisheries, forests, ore bodies, and energy sources are all being overtaxed and rapidly depleted at even today's level of economic activity.


If resources are finite but economic growth has to be endless (again, to support our chosen system of money, and for no other reason), then there's a gigantic conflict brewing. And that's the subtext to the entire confusing array of political and monetary actions and reactions of late.


A Simple Example


The idea that endless growth isn't realistic needs to be explored as often as possible simply to counteract the huge volume of spoken and written words that profess it's exactly what we both want and need.


For most people indoctrinated with the endless growth narrative, we have to engage in a bit of deprogramming before we can have a proper conversation.


So let's start with a simple example that lays this all bare.


China has been on a very impressive program of economic expansion. Of late, that's slowed down just a tiny bit and it's causing quite a bit of worry among the Chinese leadership, which believes that fast economic expansion supports social stability:


Chinese economy posts lowest growth rate since 1990



Jan 20, 2015


BEIJING - China's economy last year slumped to its lowest rate of growth in 24 years, the government announced Tuesday.


China's gross domestic product grew 7.3% in the last quarter of 2014, and 7.4% over the whole year, the slowest rate since 1990 and below the official target of 7.5%.


(Source)



Now, let's examine that 7.4% rate of growth using the handy 'rule of 72', which will answer the question:

The answer is simply 72/7.4 which equals 9.7 years. That is, if China continues to expand at 7.4%, its economy will be fully twice are large as it currently is in just under ten years.


Twice. As. Large.


Think about that for a minute. That means (roughly speaking) twice as much energy consumed, twice as many cars on the road, twice as many factories churning out twice as much stuff. Twice as much economic activity in less than a single decade from now. That's what a GDP growth rate of 7.4% means.


Of course, you won't encounter any such dot-connecting in any of the articles you will read about China's growth -- desired or actual -- because the implications of being 'twice as large' are not yet part of the global dialog about economic growth. Yet.


So let's explore just one of those implications by looking at China's coal consumption. Energy and economic activity are very tightly linked. If you want to have more economic activity, you're going to use more energy. Coal is heavily used in China to generate electricity, which is a critical form of energy for economic expansion.


In fact, when we look at China's energy consumption over these past few decades, we note one period between 2002 and 2009 where its energy use fully doubled, with coal being, by far, the largest component of that doubling:





(Source)





In just 7 years, energy use doubled! Again returning to our handy 'rule of 72,' but in an opposite direction, we can divide 72 by 7 years and calculate that China's energy use was growing by 10.3% per year during this period.

How does this compare to China's reported GDP growth during the same period? Well, according to The World Bank, between the years 2002 and 2009 China sported an average rate of GDP growth of 11%.


As expected, the growth rates for energy consumption (10.3%) and economic expansion (11%) were very tightly coupled.


Now let's take note that, in 2012, China consumed 49% of all the coal consumed in the world. How much of the world's coal will China consume if it doubles in the next 10 years?


Well, a doubling is a doubling: China's current 7.4% GDP growth rate implies that in just 10 years, give or take a little, China will consume as much coal by itself as the entire world does today.


But then what? What about the next 10 years after that? Eventually, we all have to come to the same conclusion: it's just not possible for China to double its coal consumption forever. Sooner or later, real physical and environmental limits apply.


It's Already 'Later'


My argument is that it's already 'later'. We're living through the period of time when that dawning recognition of limits will finally burst over the horizon, shining a very bright spotlight on a frightening number of our global society's unsustainable practices.


The most urgent of them all, as far as everyone reading this is concerned, is the very uncomfortable fact that it is our system of money that is most likely to break first and hardest because its very design , without which collapse ensues.


As the China example illustrates, the prospect of endless economic growth is simply not a workable plan because resources are not infinite. Our global obsession with growth is the very definition of unsustainable. Someday reality is going to intrude and ruin the party and very few are actually prepared for that future.


A very big problem we all share is that the world's central banks have been vigorously defending the status quo (of endless growth) and that means we all face a very bad period of adjustment when their efforts finally fail.


That moment of failure is coming closer and closer. Recent actions by central banks have exposed their increasingly desperate mindset and have even called into question the one thing that absolutely cannot ever be questioned: the ability of the central banks to deliver on the promise of endless growth.


Central bank credibility (as fictitious as that may be) is essential to maintaining the current narrative, BUT central banks are rapidly losing their credibility (which should have happened simply via deductive reasoning a long time ago) and the strains are showing. Their actions are increasingly wild and extreme (SNB, anyone?), and it's our view that 2015- 2016 will mark the end of this long run of overly-ambitious central bankers and over-complacent markets.


When credibility in central bank omnipotence snaps, buckle up. Risk will get re-priced, markets will fall apart, losses will mount, and politicians will seek someone (anyone, dear God, but them) to blame.


In Part 2: The Consequences Playbook we spell out what will happen next and how you should be preparing today for what might happen tomorrow. Suffice it to say, a tremendous amount of wealth will be lost if (really, ) the central banks lose control. And standards of living for many will be impacted.


A little preparation today can make a huge difference in your future.


Click here to access Part 2 of this report enrollment required for full access)


Chomsky: We Are All – Fill in the Blank.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.


Fish lurk under Antarctica ice shelf


© Deep-SCINI UNL Andrill SMO team

A fish seen at the Ross Ice Shelf grounding zone beneath nearly 2,500 feet (740 meters) of ice.



In a cold and dark underwater world, where a never-ending rain of rocks keeps the seafloor barren, researchers were startled to find fish, crustaceans and jellyfish investigating a submersible camera after drilling through nearly 2,500 feet (740 meters) of Antarctic ice.

The swimmers are in one of the world's most extreme ecosystems, hidden beneath the Ross Ice Shelf, roughly 530 miles (850 kilometers) from the open ocean. "This is the closest we can get to something like Europa," Slawek Tulaczyk, a glaciologist at the University of California, Santa Cruz and a chief scientist on the drilling project, said, referring to Jupiter's icy moon.


This is the first time scientists have drilled through an ice shelf to its grounding line. These thick, floating tongues of ice are attached to glaciers or ice sheets, and the grounding line marks the transition from land to sea. Researchers with the Whillans Ice Stream Subglacial Access Research Drilling (WISSARD) project punched through the ice with a custom hot-water drill on Jan. 8 and discovered the marine life on Jan. 16. The WISSARD drillers are crunching through the ice with the same setup used to reach Antarctica's subglacial Lake Whillans in 2013, when scientists grabbed the first evidence of microbial life from a lake under the ice sheet.


A remotely operated camera revealed the curious fish and amphipods, a type of crustacean that thrives in the ocean's harshest environments. For these translucent pink fish, which are about 8 inches (20 centimeters) long, this location is the farthest south they have ever been found, expedition scientists said. But the rocky seafloor was devoid of life. Tulaczyk said he thinks rocks that are constantly melting out of the ice sheet are responsible for the desolate conditions. Glacial ice can carry dust that is finer than flour or boulders bigger than buses.


"Forms of life that are sedentary will be stoned to death," he told Live Science from McMurdo Station in Antarctica. "The only things that can successfully explore food resources are things that can swim."


Yet the debris may also deliver much-needed nutrients - scarce in this dark, plankton-free world - in the form of ancient, carbon-rich marine sediments. For instance, ice cores brought up from the borehole contained shells called diatoms, the remains of microscopic marine creatures that lived and died before Antarctica froze over. "It could be we're looking at an old ecosystem eroding from the ice," Tulaczyk said.


Life at the grounding line is limited to about 33 feet (10 m) of freedom between the ice and seafloor, in seawater about 28 degrees Fahrenheit (minus 2 degrees Celsius). The drillers had hoped to find the outflow from Lake Whillans but saw no evidence of estuary-like brackish water, Tulaczyk said.


The researchers also retrieved samples of the sediment and seawater, to investigate how Antarctica's ice shelves are responding to rising ocean temperatures. Models suggest that Antarctica's floating ice is melting from below as ocean temperatures increase. Because ice shelves hold back glaciers on land, as the shelves shrink, these flowing glaciers may speed up, boosting sea level rise by dropping ice into the ocean more quickly.




The seawater temperature measured at the drill site was warm enough to melt ice, Tulaczyk said. "Just by measuring the seawater properties, we will be able to verify the theoretical predictions people have been making for decades now," he said. "I think this will be the reference point for what the conditions are at grounding lines. I'm quite confident that it's not representative of every place, but it establishes a baseline."

The discovery of life in the grounding zone marks the end of WISSARD's six-year endeavor in Antarctica, one of the largest glaciological experiments ever sponsored by the National Science Foundation.


Chomsky: We Are All – Fill in the Blank.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.


American Sniper or American psycho?

american sniper

© skreenrant



Breaking box office records, director Clint Eastwood's newest film, "American Sniper," raked in $107 million in its wide release in theaters over the four-day Martin Luther King holiday weekend, the biggest-ever January weekend film opening. A week earlier, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences rewarded the film with six Oscar nominations, including nods for best picture and best actor. It even moved Vice President Joe Biden, who reportedly teared up while watching it.

"American Sniper" exemplifies a sense of macho, white male braggadocio that is symbolic of all that is wrong with the right-wing, pro-war, pro-gun, bully culture of the United States. Should we really be surprised that both the American public and the Academy are rewarding a film about a man who, judging by his own words, appeared to be a psychotic mass murderer?


Eastwood's film, starring Bradley Cooper, is based on the autobiography of Chris Kyle, considered the most lethal sniper to have served in the U.S. war in Iraq. Kyle served four tours of duty and was heavily decorated for his service. He is thought to have killed 255 Iraqis, with 160 of them being confirmed kills. His book "American Sniper: The Autobiography of the Most Lethal Sniper in U.S. Military History," co-written with Jim DeFelice and Scott McEwen, was published in 2012 and shot to the top of the best-seller lists, remaining there for months. In early 2013, Kyle was shot and killed in Texas by another U.S. soldier, who is currently awaiting trial.


In a debate that I moderated Tuesday between Kyle's co-author DeFelice and independent journalist and blogger Rania Khalek on "Uprising," DeFelice said the movie was true to the book, and that the film crew "did a remarkable job." But Khalek, who has been one of social media's foremost critics of the film, has called it "brilliant propaganda that erases U.S. crimes."


Having read the book and watched the movie, she described both as "racist atrocity porn." The film, Khalek said, has stripped away some of the most disturbing aspects of Kyle's story from the book, so that it is "sanitized for mass appeal." In fact, she explained that "the Chris Kyle in the book is a little bit different than the Chris Kyle in the movie ... and presented as a much more complex character who's anguished over what he has to do." In fact, in his writings, Kyle openly acknowledged that he viewed Iraqis as "savages" whom he enjoyed killing. His only regret, Khalek contended, is that he wished he had killed more.


DeFelice defended Kyle, saying, "The people who he called savages were terrorists who were willing to use children to kill not only Americans but other Iraqis. ... To think that Chris was murdering or massacring innocent Iraqis - that's just not in the book, that's not accurate."


But U.S. soldiers routinely killed innocent Iraqi civilians. In the early days of the war, this report from 2004 described how American snipers terrorized Iraqi civilians trying to enter and leave a hospital in Fallujah, even shooting an unarmed elderly woman in the head. An incident from 2006 came to light in a WikiLeaks exposé of an incident in the town of Ishaqi where U.S. soldiers killed 10 Iraqi civilians, mostly women and young children, and then called in an airstrike to cover it up. In a 2007 story, The New York Times described a Defense Department program that involved "planting fake weapons and bomb-making material as bait, and then killing anyone who picks them up." The "baiting program" came to light within the case of three U.S. soldiers who killed unarmed Iraqis. According to Iraq Body Count, over the course of the U.S. war in Iraq from 2003 to 2011, "U.S. forces killed far more Iraqi civilians than any other members of the U.S.-led coalition," a number totaling a staggering 15,060.


The larger problem with "American Sniper," Khalek said, "is that it completely whitewashes U.S. atrocities in Iraq," which includes the horrific fact that "at the very least 500,000 Iraqis were killed because of the U.S. invasion and occupation." She added, "Americans in general have yet to deal with the Iraq War, which I would argue was probably one of the worst atrocities of the first decade of the century."


I asked DeFelice whether he was convinced that every Iraqi whom Kyle killed deserved to die. The author answered "yes," citing that the Rules of Engagement "were so tight that it could not have been otherwise." But in the book, Kyle claimed that "Our ROEs when the [Iraq War] kicked off were pretty simple: If you see anyone from about 16 to 65 and they're male, shoot 'em. Kill every male you see. That wasn't the official language, but that was the idea."


DeFelice dismissed this idea, saying, "That's the beginning of the war when they're actually engaging regular Iraq forces. ... The situations were always different, and even within each deployment they were different." But Kyle's definition of the standard ROE to essentially kill almost any Iraqi man has been echoed by other U.S. vets.


And yet we're expected to believe that of the hundreds of Iraqis he killed, Kyle shot only those who deserved to die. The dehumanization of Iraqis that Kyle seemed to have internalized is fully reflected in the film. According to Khalek, in "American Sniper," Iraqis are "depicted as racist, soulless, bloodthirsty monsters for daring to take up arms against invaders." This is a portrayal that is not lost on at least some Americans who were personally inspired to threaten to kill Iraqis after having watched the film, and cheerfully tweeted about it. Among the tweets are: "American sniper makes me wanna go shoot some fuckin Arabs," "teared up at the end of American Sniper. Great fucking movie and now I really want to kill some fucking ragheads," and "Just watched american sniper and I feel like killing every sand nigger on the fucking planet."


Khalek challenged public silence in the face of such reactions, saying, "I would love to hear that denounced or condemned by the writers of the book and the people who made this film. I call on people like Clint Eastwood and Bradley Cooper to, at the very least, denounce these threats."


Not only has the film inspired violent verbal reactions against Iraqis, criticism of the movie has drawn an even more brutal backlash. Khalek in particular has received vile death and rape threats that ironically involve fantasies of her being subjected to cruel abuses by ISIS militants (this essay is likely to inspire similar expressions of online bullying). Khalek asked, "I want to know, where are the moderate Americans to condemn the racism and the violent threats that I'm receiving just for criticizing the book?"


To his credit, DeFelice did respond during the debate, saying, "No one should be making any threats ... against anybody, whatever their political views are. This is America, you are absolutely entitled to have ... whatever opinion you want."


But Cooper has defended the film, telling The Daily Beast, "It's not a political discussion about war." Yet, most on the American right are clear on the pro-war agenda of the film. The extreme conservative news site Breitbart seemed to get it, calling the film "the 'Passion of the Christ' of war movies," and a "pro-war masterpiece."


When asked whether he was disturbed that the book and the film seemed to glorify war, DeFelice countered, "So you mean telling the truth is a bad thing?" But as Khalek has pointed out, the veracity of the film is in serious question, and in fact, even Kyle's own honesty has been challenged, as per this Washington Post article.


Ultimately Kyle, and the film based on his life, embody an American fantasy of self-righteous purpose that celebrates violence and trumps all other considerations. It is a vision of a world where force of might rules, and the rest of us must agree to live in fear or be stifled, or worse, snuffed out. Sarah Palin was so taken by the impression of heroism with which the film imbues Kyle that she dropped this gem on her Facebook page Monday: "Hollywood leftists: While caressing shiny plastic trophies you exchange among one another while spitting on the graves of freedom fighters who allow you to do what you do, just realize the rest of America knows you're not fit to shine Chris Kyle's combat boots." In Khalek's words, "Nationalism is a hell of a drug."


Chomsky: We Are All – Fill in the Blank.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.


When this ends, everybody gets hurt and the end is uncomfortably close


© Arthur Cofod / Pictures Inc./Time Life Pictures/Getty Images



Central banks around the globe have taken us all into unchartered territory, where the possible paths boil down to a binary outcome: either it all works out or it doesn't.

Unfortunately, the 'it all works out' outcome has a very low probability of actually happening; so the binary outcome isn't equally weighted like a coin toss. By 'working out', here's what the central banks all striving (praying?) for:



  • Inflation of 2% to 3% per year

  • Economic growth of at least 6% per year (nominal) and a real (inflation adjusted) rate of 3% per year.


The reason that the central banks want all of this growth and inflation isn't because it's good for you, me, or anybody we know. Instead, the bankers need it because that's what our exponential money system requires.

Slaves To The System


It bears repeating, inflation is not rising prices -- those are of inflation -- but instead is the expansion of the existing stock of money and credit. If we observe the symptom of 'rising prices', then that means the underlying mechanism of expansion of credit (mainly) and money (less important because the money supply is a only fraction of the volume of credit) is functioning.


Think of it this way: it's like the central banks want a slightly feverish patient and so they track the patient's temperature. They tell everyone that 100 degrees, perhaps 101, is the perfect temperature...slightly elevated, but not too much. But the patient's temperature is merely a . The underlying for having an elevated temperature is having too many foreign bodies living within the patient, like having too much money and credit in an economic arena.


With increasing levels of credit in our monetary system, the system functions reasonable well and enough new loans are being made to service both the principal balances of prior loans plus their interest payments. But with stagnant or falling levels of credit, the exact opposite is true and the entire financial system slips into collapse mode.



We are now in service to our system of money, not the other way around. That is, we have a money system to which we are now slaves. It's either expanding or collapsing, but has no stable state; no easy equilibrium that it can inhabit.

The tragedy in all this is that we can easily have a different system of money that does not make such unreasonable demands of us. But virtually nobody in power is (yet) discussing this idea.


The Folly Of Endless Growth


Getting back to the central bank wish list, nominal GDP of at least 6% with real growth of 3% allows governments to expand their debt loads by 3% per year without them ever getting larger in proportion to the underlying economy. That way, they never have to be paid back. They only grow larger, and this means more borrowing/credit in the system which is part of requirement #1, above.


So the entire central bank playbook, in slavish devoted service to an obviously dysfunctional system of money, boils down to endless credit growth coupled to endless economic growth.


Endless growth. When you hear of how central bankers are 'battling deflation' or 'seeking price stability of at least 2% inflation', just think to yourself What they really want is endless growth.


The next thought you should have is


The answers, clearly, are No and NO!


Every day, we have further confirmation of the idea that the world has limits and that economic growth requires more resources. Water, soil, fisheries, forests, ore bodies, and energy sources are all being overtaxed and rapidly depleted at even today's level of economic activity.


If resources are finite but economic growth has to be endless (again, to support our chosen system of money, and for no other reason), then there's a gigantic conflict brewing. And that's the subtext to the entire confusing array of political and monetary actions and reactions of late.


A Simple Example


The idea that endless growth isn't realistic needs to be explored as often as possible simply to counteract the huge volume of spoken and written words that profess it's exactly what we both want and need.


For most people indoctrinated with the endless growth narrative, we have to engage in a bit of deprogramming before we can have a proper conversation.


So let's start with a simple example that lays this all bare.


China has been on a very impressive program of economic expansion. Of late, that's slowed down just a tiny bit and it's causing quite a bit of worry among the Chinese leadership, which believes that fast economic expansion supports social stability:


Chinese economy posts lowest growth rate since 1990



Jan 20, 2015


BEIJING - China's economy last year slumped to its lowest rate of growth in 24 years, the government announced Tuesday.


China's gross domestic product grew 7.3% in the last quarter of 2014, and 7.4% over the whole year, the slowest rate since 1990 and below the official target of 7.5%.


(Source)



Now, let's examine that 7.4% rate of growth using the handy 'rule of 72', which will answer the question:

The answer is simply 72/7.4 which equals 9.7 years. That is, if China continues to expand at 7.4%, its economy will be fully twice are large as it currently is in just under ten years.


Twice. As. Large.


Think about that for a minute. That means (roughly speaking) twice as much energy consumed, twice as many cars on the road, twice as many factories churning out twice as much stuff. Twice as much economic activity in less than a single decade from now. That's what a GDP growth rate of 7.4% means.


Of course, you won't encounter any such dot-connecting in any of the articles you will read about China's growth -- desired or actual -- because the implications of being 'twice as large' are not yet part of the global dialog about economic growth. Yet.


So let's explore just one of those implications by looking at China's coal consumption. Energy and economic activity are very tightly linked. If you want to have more economic activity, you're going to use more energy. Coal is heavily used in China to generate electricity, which is a critical form of energy for economic expansion.


In fact, when we look at China's energy consumption over these past few decades, we note one period between 2002 and 2009 where its energy use fully doubled, with coal being, by far, the largest component of that doubling:





(Source)



In just 7 years, energy use doubled! Again returning to our handy 'rule of 72,' but in an opposite direction, we can divide 72 by 7 years and calculate that China's energy use was growing by 10.3% per year during this period.

How does this compare to China's reported GDP growth during the same period? Well, according to The World Bank, between the years 2002 and 2009 China sported an average rate of GDP growth of 11%.


As expected, the growth rates for energy consumption (10.3%) and economic expansion (11%) were very tightly coupled.


Now let's take note that, in 2012, China consumed 49% of all the coal consumed in the world. How much of the world's coal will China consume if it doubles in the next 10 years?


Well, a doubling is a doubling: China's current 7.4% GDP growth rate implies that in just 10 years, give or take a little, China will consume as much coal by itself as the entire world does today.


But then what? What about the next 10 years after that? Eventually, we all have to come to the same conclusion: it's just not possible for China to double its coal consumption forever. Sooner or later, real physical and environmental limits apply.


It's Already 'Later'


My argument is that it's already 'later'. We're living through the period of time when that dawning recognition of limits will finally burst over the horizon, shining a very bright spotlight on a frightening number of our global society's unsustainable practices.


The most urgent of them all, as far as everyone reading this is concerned, is the very uncomfortable fact that it is our system of money that is most likely to break first and hardest because its very design , without which collapse ensues.


As the China example illustrates, the prospect of endless economic growth is simply not a workable plan because resources are not infinite. Our global obsession with growth is the very definition of unsustainable. Someday reality is going to intrude and ruin the party and very few are actually prepared for that future.


A very big problem we all share is that the world's central banks have been vigorously defending the status quo (of endless growth) and that means we all face a very bad period of adjustment when their efforts finally fail.


That moment of failure is coming closer and closer. Recent actions by central banks have exposed their increasingly desperate mindset and have even called into question the one thing that absolutely cannot ever be questioned: the ability of the central banks to deliver on the promise of endless growth.


Central bank credibility (as fictitious as that may be) is essential to maintaining the current narrative, BUT central banks are rapidly losing their credibility (which should have happened simply via deductive reasoning a long time ago) and the strains are showing. Their actions are increasingly wild and extreme (SNB, anyone?), and it's our view that 2015- 2016 will mark the end of this long run of overly-ambitious central bankers and over-complacent markets.


When credibility in central bank omnipotence snaps, buckle up. Risk will get re-priced, markets will fall apart, losses will mount, and politicians will seek someone (anyone, dear God, but them) to blame.


In Part 2: The Consequences Playbook we spell out what will happen next and how you should be preparing today for what might happen tomorrow. Suffice it to say, a tremendous amount of wealth will be lost if (really, ) the central banks lose control. And standards of living for many will be impacted.


A little preparation today can make a huge difference in your future.


Click here to access Part 2 of this report enrollment required for full access)


Chomsky: We Are All – Fill in the Blank.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.


Indian space scientists fear the return of a 'mini ice age'


© Zmescience.com



The fewer sunspot activities on the Sun witnessed since the last two solar cycles might lead to a "mini ice age-like situation" in coming years, Shrinivas Aundhkar, the director of Mahatma Gandhi Mission, Centre for Astronomy and Space Technology, Nanded, said here on Tuesday.

"The sunspots that can be seen on the Sun have comparatively less temperature compared to other surfaces on it (Sun)," he said while addressing a gathering for a lecture, Get Ready for Little Ice Age, held as part of the Narendra Dabholkar lecture series.


Aundhkar, who has worked with scientists across the world on Sun-Earth connection, said, "The Sun undergoes two cycles that are described as maximum and minimum. The activity alternates every 11 years, and the period is termed as one solar cycle. At present, the Sun is undergoing the minimum phase, reducing global temperatures."


He said winter temperatures have dropped in the northern polar cap and is leading to severe winters. "This has also triggered the jet stream, which is active in the northern parts of the globe to shift in inter tropical climate zone like India. As a result, cold wind conditions were witnessed during the last two years. The unseasonal hailstorms in November and December are a result of the influence of the jet stream. This has also led to steady weakening of magnetic energy of the Sun, leading to mini ice age like situation," he said.


"The Sun, our energy source, goes through phases of violent (maximum phase) and quiet (minimum phase) activity every 11 years, which is called one solar cycle. The effects of minimum activity of a solar cycle are seen for about a year. However, it has been revealed that the minimum activity was seen for more than four years in the recently concluded solar cycle. Thus, it was the longest and quietest minimum phase in the past 100 years," the scientist said.


"The Earth may be heading towards a mini-ice age period, which is similar to what was observed in the 17th century. During the time, the sunspots on the Sun were absent. This led to a drop in northern hemisphere temperature by 2-3 degrees. The current scenario is almost same. Such climatic conditions might affect the agricultural pattern and health and trigger disasters in the worst scenario," he added.


Chomsky: We Are All – Fill in the Blank.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.


14 People Hold The Secret Keys That Control The Internet.



Each year, 14 elite people use secret keys in a ceremony that controls the very fiber of the worldwide internet. ICAAN ( The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers ) is an organization that handles the secret databases that control all routing of named website traffic. Deep in places like an anonymous compound in southwest Los Angeles, or a large campus in Culpepper Virgina, these 14 people meet four times every year under the strictest security to unlock the very keys to the internet.


security-2000x1295-30jul13-en


At the heart of this ritual is the generation of secret cryptography “keys,” otherwise known as Root Keys. These Keys are complicated bits of code that are generated with powerful software that is virtually “un-crackable.” The rituals tightly follow the specifications set out in the SAS 70 auditing standard. The purpose of these rules is to ensure that the process follows strict protocols that ensure security. The process itself is like a scene from a spy movie replete with retinal scans for the participants and safes equipped with seismic sensors.


accountability-mechanisms-5100x3300-19mar14-en


Why is this ritual so important? And what does it mean for the rest of us? In one sense the ICANN databases are like a live rosetta stone that directs all the top level website traffic. If someone could manage to break into the database they could wreak havoc by maliciously re-directing websites. With as much reliance as we have on the modern web this could throw the world into chaos and cause untold financial damage worldwide.


In fact, ICAAN was recently hacked using a spear-fishing exploit. The attackers used social engineering by sending spoofed emails to collect passwords that gave them access to the internal workings of the organization. ICANN sent an email that warned that “the attacker obtained administrative access to all files in the CZDS, including copies of the zone files in the system. The information you provided as a CZDS user might have been downloaded by the attacker. This may have included your name, postal address, email address, fax and telephone numbers, and your username and password.” With this exploit the hackers gained access to crucial elements of the ICANN system such as the Centralized Zone Data System, the wiki pages of the Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC), the domain registration Whois portal, and the organization’s blog. While this attack did not compromise the core of the system, it did prove that the system can be vulnerable and that malevolent forces are constantly scheming to penetrate and wrestle control from the guardians.


In 2012 the organization suffered a critical failure when it’s application system for new top-level domains caused it to shut down it’s entire program for months. ICAAN vaguely dismissed the issue as only a “glitch,” which has caused some concern over whether the system and the organization is capable of transparency or can be trusted at all with this responsibility.


In the wake of recent high profile hacking exploits such as the Sony breach, the commerce department and Homeland Security have taken a deeper interest in the process. This has raised the hackles of many international players like Russia and Brazil because of the recent revelations of rampant NSA spying. The European commission along with others has called for more international control of the process even suggesting that control be handed over to the United Nations.


icann


And so the debate rages on. Is the health and viability of this crucial task safe in the hands of this organization? Does the United States have undue control over the process? Will a James Bond villain

scenario bring the online world crashing to it’s knees? Is the internet secretly being controlled by a shadow cabal of international globalist? For now, the fate of the world wide web rests in the hands of these 14 select key holders and the faith of the world in their capability to keep the internet secure and open.


KSK Key Signing Ceremony




Dead bodies in NATO uniforms and U.S. weapons found under debris of Donetsk airport


© Nikolay Muraviyov/TASS



Dead bodies in NATO uniforms and a great number of US-made weapons have been recovered from under the debris of the Donetsk airport, Eduard Basurin, a spokesman for the defense ministry of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic (DPR) said on Thursday.

"While examining the building of the Donetsk airport, we found a great number of American firearms, assault rifles and hand mortars, equipment and communications devices," he said. "We also found publications in European languages, including on religious matters."


Apart from that, "we found dead bodies in NATO uniforms under the debris in the new terminal. Personal belongings indicated that these people were foreign citizens contracted by private military companies who operated under the disguise of Ukrainian subversive groups," he said.


Chomsky: We Are All – Fill in the Blank.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.