Focused on providing independent journalism.

Saturday, 14 February 2015

34 wildfires reported across Arkansas


© THV11

Wildfire threatens Rush Historic District of Buffalo National River



34 wildfires were reported in Arkansas over the weekend.

According to the Arkansas Forestry Commission, those wildfires burned across 492 acres.


Air tankers dropped water on fires in Hot Spring and Clark Counties.


The wildfire danger remains moderate for most of Arkansas and low risk on the northeast side of the state.


There are currently no active burn bans.


Chomsky: We Are All – Fill in the Blank.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.


34 wildfires reported in Arkansas


© THV11

Wildfire threatens Rush Historic District of Buffalo National River



34 wildfires were reported in Arkansas over the weekend.

According to the Arkansas Forestry Commission, those wildfires burned across 492 acres.


Air tankers dropped water on fires in Hot Spring and Clark Counties.


The wildfire danger remains moderate for most of Arkansas and low risk on the northeast side of the state.


There are currently no active burn bans.


Chomsky: We Are All – Fill in the Blank.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.


The FDA is hiding scientific fraud, and you should be pissed

FDA

© io9



When the FDA encounters instances of scientific misconduct, it buries the evidence. A recent investigation sheds light on the extent of the problem.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration - the agency tasked with protecting public health via regulation of everything from food safety to prescription drugs - occasionally encounters serious instances of misconduct in biomedical research. According to an investigation published in the latest issue of the these cases include




...falsification or submission of false information... problems with adverse events reporting... protocol violations... inadequate or inaccurate recordkeeping... failure to protect the safety of patients and/or issues with oversight or informed consent... [among other violations]




Study author Charles Seife, an acclaimed science writer and professor of journalism at NYU, writes that "the FDA has no systematic method of communicating these findings to the scientific community, leaving open the possibility that research misconduct detected by a government agency goes unremarked in the peer-reviewed literature." In the course of his investigation, he identified fifty seven published clinical trials for which an FDA inspection of the trial site had turned up "significant evidence" for at least of the aforementioned problems.

The problem with these problems is that they are not reported. At least, not in any meaningful way. "The FDA has no systematic method of communicating these findings to the scientific community," writes Seife, "leaving open the possibility that research misconduct detected by a government agency goes unremarked in the peer-reviewed literature." By failing to make this information readily available, the FDA compromises the ability of scientists, doctors, and the public - that means you - to remain informed about scientific trials fraught with misconduct.


The most troubling thing about the FDA's reticence about these matters is that it is characterized by more than silence. As Seife writes in a supplemental piece published at Slate, the FDA is engaged in "active deception." This is something the FDA has been accused of in the past. In his piece, Seife describes the process by which he and his students dug up even more damning evidence of the FDA's surreptitious practices:




My students and I looked at FDA documents relating to roughly 600 clinical trials in which one of the researchers running the trial failed an FDA inspection. In only roughly 100 cases were we able to figure out which study, which drug, and which pharmaceutical company were involved. (We cracked a bunch of the redactions by cross-referencing the documents with clinical trials data, checking various other databases, and using carefully crafted Google searches.) For the other 500, the FDA was successfully able to shield the drugmaker (and the study sponsor) from public exposure.


It's not just the public that's in the dark. It's researchers, too. And your doctor. As I describe in the current issue of , my students and I were able to track down some 78 scientific publications resulting from a tainted study—a clinical trial in which FDA inspectors found significant problems with the conduct of the trial, up to and including fraud. In only three cases did we find any hint in the peer-reviewed literature of problems found by the FDA inspection. The other publications were not retracted, corrected, or highlighted in any way. In other words, the FDA knows about dozens of scientific papers floating about whose data are questionable—and has said nothing, leaving physicians and medical researchers completely unaware. The silence is unbroken even when the FDA itself seems shocked at the degree of fraud and misconduct in a clinical trial.


Such was the case with the so-called RECORD 4 study. RECORD 4 was one of four large clinical trials that involved thousands of patients who were recruited at scores of clinical sites in more than a dozen countries around the world. The trial was used as evidence that a new anti-blood-clotting agent, rivaroxaban, was safe and effective. The FDA inspected or had access to external audits of 16 of the RECORD 4 sites. The trial was a fiasco. At Dr. Craig Loucks' site in Colorado, the FDA found falsified data. At Dr. Ricardo Esquivel's site in Mexico, there was "systematic discarding of medical records" that made it impossible to tell whether the study drug was given to the patients. At half of the sites that drew FDA scrutiny—eight out of 16—there was misconduct, fraud, fishy behavior, or other practices so objectionable that the data had to be thrown out. The problems were so bad and so widespread that, contrary to its usual practice, the FDA declared the entire study to be "unreliable." Yet if you look in the medical journals, the results from RECORD 4 sit quietly in without any hint in the literature about falsification, misconduct, or chaos behind the scenes. This means that physicians around the world are basing life-and-death medical decisions on a study that the FDA knows is simply not credible.




Read the rest of Seife's piece at Slate. Read the results of his and his students' investigation in the latest issue of JAMA. Seife has also made all primary documents for the exposé available on his website.

Chomsky: We Are All – Fill in the Blank.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.


Update: Over 100 pilot whales now dead following New Zealand stranding


© AFP

Scientists are unclear why pilot whales strand themselves in large groups



More than 100 pilot whales that stranded on a New Zealand beach have died, conservation officials said on Saturday, voicing grave fears for more than 90 others from the pod.

The whales beached themselves on Friday at Farewell Spit at the northern tip of the South Island, with dozens of rescuers racing to re-float the marine mammals on the evening high tide.


But Department of Conservation (DOC) spokesman Andrew Lamason said the whales had swam aground again overnight after being shepherded out to deep water.


"We've now got 103 that are confirmed dead and we're trying to keep the rest alive," he told AFP.


"There's about 150 volunteers trying to make them as comfortable as possible, they're putting sheets on them and water over them.


"But we're preparing ourselves for a pretty bad outcome, each time they re-strand their health goes down quite dramatically."


Lamason said the incident was distressing for all involved.


"There's a lot of young ones out there that have already passed away. It's been quite an emotional time for our staff," he said. "The whales also go through a lot of physical and emotional trauma."


He said another attempt at refloating would be made at high tide late Saturday, but if that failed then euthanasia would be discussed.


Farewell Spit beach, about 150 kilometres (95 miles) west of the tourist town of Nelson, has been the scene of mass pilot whale strandings in the past.


There have been at least eight in the past decade, including two within the space of a week in January last year, although the latest stranding is one of the largest.


"It seems to happen each summer," Lamason said. "It's highly likely it's the geography, potentially they're coming in here hunting for fish and becoming disorientated and dying.


"It could be that some of the pods are sick and that brings them up onto the beach, we don't really know."


Pilot whales grow up to six metres (20 feet) long and are the most common species of whale in New Zealand waters.


Chomsky: We Are All – Fill in the Blank.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.


One person killed and four injured in wild boar attack in India




Wild boar



One person was killed and at least four others were injured, two of them seriously, when a rogue wild boar went on a rampage and attacked a group of farm labourers in Odisha's Kendrapara district, a forest official said today.

The incident occurred yesterday in Hatabanapur village when the farm labourers were engaged in rabi crop cultivation, he said.


The village where the incident took place is away from forest areas and animals had not strayed into it in the past.


As the people tried to chase away the animal it turned violent and attacked the farm workers, said Divisional Forest Officer, Cuttack Territorial Forest Division, Sudarshan Behera.


"Such act of trespassing and consequent attack on humans by wild boar was never witnessed in Kendrapara and Derabish areas. It is quite perplexing to find the intrusion of these animals in places which are bereft of forest cover", he said.


Bhitarkanika's mangrove forest cover is an ideal habitat for wild boars. But there is remote possibility of boars straying into these thickly populated pockets from far away Bhitarkanika.


There are reports of wild boars inhabiting in Asiagada forest near Lalitgiri Buddhist monastery in Jajpur district. The rogue wild boar might have strayed from there, Behera said.


Forest personnel have begun maintaining night watch and vigil in the village and villagers have been advised to avoid movement during the night, forest department officers said.


Chomsky: We Are All – Fill in the Blank.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.


The typical profile of America's most violent extremists are angry, armed and white


© Shutterstock



Police in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, say they're investigating the role racial hatred played in the killing of three Muslim students by suspect Craig Stephen Hicks. They're saying the 46-year-old white man had a history of fights over a parking space with the victims, suggesting the killings could be reduced to road rage.

Meanwhile, Hicks' social media posts show that he was an ardent atheist who equally mocked Muslims and Christians, an avid defender of the Constitution's separation of church and state, and a gun nut who posted pictures of his revolver. The Associated Press quoted neighbors who say "he always seemed angry and frequently confronted his neighbors" and "his ex-wife said he was obsessed with the shooting rampage movie and showed "no compassion at all."


The further reported that the father of two victims, who were sisters, "said this man was hateful. He was picking fights, knocking on their door." The also said Hicks obsessively called tow truck companies to have his neighbors' cars towed, and once even met tow truck drivers in the street waving a gun.


We can safely say that Craig Stephen Hicks fits the profile of the most common type of domestic violent extremist - a white man with grievances and guns. Whether he was provoked by road rage, rage against neighbors who wore traditional Muslim clothing, or other simmering grudges and pathologies, his alleged killing of three young Muslims underscores a trend that mainstream U.S. media avoids: that the face of violent extremism in America since 9/11 is predominantly white. Muslims in America, while not exempt from crime, simply do not compare.


There's no shortage of crime statistics confirming this. A 2001-2015 "Homegrown Extremism" analysis by the New America Foundation parsed the "ethnicity, age, gender and citizenship" of people who killed or violently attacked others, whether they were motivated by jihadist philosophies or other "right wing, left wing or idiosyncratic beliefs." Of 448 extremists counted, white men who were U.S. citizens outnumbered every other demographic by wide margins.


"Quite a few reports agree, that more Americans have been killed by the radical right since 9/11 than by jihadists," said Mark Potok, spokesman for the Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks hate crimes and focuses on the radical right. "Obviously, if you go back one day to 9/11 (2001), nearly 3,000 people were killed."


Potok said some hate crimes can be simple and spontaneous, while others are more complex to unravel.


"When you look at Chapel Hill, it seems to be a classic case of a very tangled-up motive," he said. "Who's to say how much a parking dispute played, or how much this man's antipathy toward religious people, or Muslims in particular, played a part. The women [who were killed] told their father he didn't like the way they dressed."


Chapel Hill police may never determine the precise role racial or religious hatred played, he said, if they can find enough other evidence to try and convict Hicks of murder. That's because it may be easier to prove he stalked and shot them, no matter what the motives, than to prove what was going on inside his head. "The criminal penalty is often about the same," Potok said.


The FBI lists nearly 6,000 hate crime incidents in 2013, its latest statistics. Only a fraction of these make the national news, like the Chapel Hill murders. But the big picture, as 's national security reporter, Peter Bergen, reported last April on the anniversary of the Boston Marathon bombing, is that "since 9/11, extremists affiliated with a variety of far-right wing ideologies, including white supremacists, anti-abortion extremists, and anti-government militants, have killed more people in the United States than have extremists motivated by al Qaeda's ideology."


Right-wing media, such as , doesn't want to hear that analysis. It attacked Bergen - who also works with New America Foundation - for "gimmick" statistics, such as counting "Andrew Joseph Stack, who flew a plane into an IRS office in Austin, Texas, in 2010." It wrote, "This is surprising given that Stack's manifesto/suicide note included attacks on the 'monsters of organized religion,' GM executives, health insurance companies, wealthy bankers, [and] 'presidential puppet GW Bush.'"


On Thursday, GOPUSA.com sought to replay that script and portrayed Hicks as a liberal, by reporting his Facebook likes included Rachel Maddow, gay marriage groups, Neil deGrasse Tyson and others. That relabeling is absurd on many levels, because Hicks appears to fit the pyschological profile of violent extremists - regardless of their ideological stripes - and that includes many white Americans.


As the Violence Policy Center noted Thursday, Hicks had a state-issued concealed handgun permit and was a "champion of Second Amendment rights." Moreover, on Thursday, SPLC issued a report, "Age of the Wolf," which focuses on how unstable individuals - not organized groups - have become the predominant domestic threat.


The report examines extreme violence in America between April 2009 and February 2015 and found "that domestic terrorism and related radical violence - as opposed to terrorist attacks emanating from overseas" is what plagues the nation. The report comes as the White House will host a summit on violent extremism next week.


"There's no question the jihadist threat is a tremendous one," SPLC wrote. "But that is not the only terrorist threat facing Americans today. A large number of independent studies have agreed that since the 9/11 mass murder, more people have been killed in America by non-Islamic domestic terrorists than jihadists."


SPLC found that "almost half of the attacks during the period apparently were motivated by the ideology of the antigovernment 'Patriot' movement, including 'sovereign citizens,' whose movement has been described by the FBI as 'domestic terrorist.'" The other half were from people with "ideologies of hate, ranging from white supremacy to misogyny to radical Islamism."


Most assailants were not young like the Boston Marathon bombers, but "were clustered most heavily between 30 and 49 years of age, although a surprising number were older than that," it said. "This suggests that perpetrators spend many years on the radical right, absorbing extremist ideology, before finally acting out violently."


That summation strongly resembles Craig Stephen Hicks.


"The one thing we know is that the psychology has always been the same," Joe Navarro, a former FBI agent and co-founder of the agency's Behavioral Analysis Program, said in a Q&A in the SPLC report. "By that, I mean you have individuals who are collecting wounds, they're looking for social ills, or things that have gone wrong, and they are nourishing these things that they're ideating, that they're thinking about. The solution for them is violence."


"What they have in common is that once they begin to ideate this philosophy, whatever their passion is, whatever their hatred is, whatever their ideology is, they certainly all begin to communicate this to people around them," Navarro said. "And when we go back and do the post-event analysis, we find that they were talking about this, they were telling people about this, and the people either ignored it, didn't pay attention or didn't think it would go any further."


Potok, the SPLC spokesman, said that domestic law enforcement did not want to believe that white people could be terrorists - or even violent extremists - until Timothy McVeigh bombed the Oklahoma federal building in 1995. Then they shifted gears and focused on many domestic anti-government and ideological groups. But that focus changed, he said, after the 9/11 attacks in 2001, as law enforcement again saw radical Islam as the primary threat.


Just as the Violence Policy Center hopes the Chapel Hill killings will push politicans to reconsider concealed handgun permit laws, SPLC hope the threat of lone-wolf violent extremists - especially white right-wingers - will prompt police and mainsteam media to stop demonizing Muslims.


"But no," David Neiwert wrote in a recent AlterNet piece, "Why Doesn't American Media Freak Out When the Terrorists Have White Skin?" "Instead, we are having conversations in Europe and America about how to deal with Muslims."


Chomsky: We Are All – Fill in the Blank.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.


Day before ceasefire: Mine explodes near Zakharchenko's house

donetsk

© AFP 2015/ Vasily Maximov



A mine had exploded near the residence of Alexander Zakharchenko, 100 meters away from the journalists who had gathered for a press conference with the leader of the self proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic, RIA Novosti correspondent reports.


At least three people have been killed and four injured.


"Bundestag lawmakers were at my residence two hours before this happened. We were nearby when a mine exploded 100 meters away," Alexander Zakharchenko told RIA Novosti.


On Thursday, the Contact Group, comprising envoys from Moscow, Kiev, DPR, self-proclaimed Luhansk People's Republic and OSCE, signed a peace deal aimed at ending the conflict in southeastern Ukraine. The deal was agreed upon by leaders of Ukraine, France, Germany and Russia after 16-hour talks in Minsk, the capital of Belarus.


The measures include a ceasefire between Kiev forces and independence supporters in eastern Ukraine, the creation of a buffer zone between the two sides through the withdrawal of heavy weaponry from the region and an all-for-all prisoner exchange.


The ceasefire comes into force at midnight local time on February 15 (February 14, 22:00 GMT).


Chomsky: We Are All – Fill in the Blank.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.