Focused on providing independent journalism.

Saturday, 14 February 2015

70th Anniversary of The Dresden Holocaust

Dresden bombing



German civil defense officials collect bodies and start sifting through the rubble in the aftermath of the attack in Dresden



More people died in the fire bombing of Dresden on February 13th to 14th, 1945 than in the nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined. Holocaust (noun) - "Great destruction resulting in the extensive loss of life, especially by fire."

[embedded content]




Chomsky: We Are All – Fill in the Blank.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.


500 starving sea lion pups have washed ashore along the California coast since the start of 2015


© Thinkstock

Sea lion pup.



Starving sea lion pups have been washing ashore along the California coast for the past three winters and experts have very few clues as to why this is happening.

"They're extremely emaciated, basically starving to death," Shawn Johnson of the Marine Mammal Center in Sausalito, California told National Geographic.


Since the start of the year, almost 500 pups have been admitted to the state's rehabilitation centers, with the Sausalito facility handling 171 cases so far. Last year, it took until April for the center to hit the 100-case mark.


Officials said they are particularly concerned because they've yet to hit the peak stranding season, which is traditionally a few months away.


"We're all kind of holding our breath," said Justin Viezbicke, stranding network coordinator for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).


Canaries of the sea


Sea lions are sort of the "canaries in the coal mine" for ocean health and an unhealthy population usually means that something has gone wrong. Unfortunately, scientists aren't sure exactly what that might be.


Scientists have mentioned that the stranding pattern was similar to that of significant El Niño years, when warm waters replace the cool, nutrient-rich waters that typically fuel the area's production. However, these aren't El Niño years.


In addition to the struggling pups, nothing else has been clearly wrong, with not one other species likewise affected. Also, adult sea lions looked fine.


Theories


So far, scientists have eliminated known diseases and ecological toxins, which might be likely to affect greater than just pups. Some scientists question if the sea lion population has grown so big that the offshore environs simply can't support their numbers.


The most popular theory appears to be that changes populations of sardines and other sea lion prey are forcing nursing sea lion mothers to go farther in trying to find food. These extended forays keep sea lion mothers away from their pups. This could cause the small animals wait on the beaches and go without food until they ultimately go out their own, well before they're ready to handle the Pacific Ocean.


NOAA teams are out on the Channel Islands, investigating the sea lion population and attempting to fill in the knowledge gaps.


One thing that scientists have seen come out in the last year is a substantial, prolonged spot of warm ocean water that has established offshore and may be bumping the ecosystems of western North America out of whack.


"It's been a really unusually warm year, and disruptive to the normal marine food web, from Baja all the way up to Alaska," said Nate Mantua of NOAA's Southwest Fisheries Science Center.


Mantua noted that wind and weather patterns in 2014 generated patches of warm water from Mexico to Alaska. Those patches then merged, forming a large pool that experts think may hang around for awhile.


The NOAA researchers emphasized that it is too soon to tell if the warm-water pool is affecting the sea lions, or if the pups are a harbinger of something else going on beneath the waves.


Chomsky: We Are All – Fill in the Blank.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.


Drones to explore Amazon for evidence of ancient civilizations

Scientists plan to use drones to scour the Amazonian forests for evidence of ancient civilizations. New discoveries suggest that sophisticated cultures similar to those in other parts of the Americas once occupied the area.

[embedded content]




Data on ancient settlements in the Amazon, which have been accumulating over the last few years, show that civilization there was far more advanced than previously thought. BBC News is reporting that the discovery of geoglyphs, where deforestation has taken place, may point to highly developed urban cultures similar to other peoples in pre-Columbian times, such as the Olmecs, Mayans, Aztecs and Incas.

Until now, the idea that an advanced civilization was lost in the Amazonian forests was considered to be just a myth or the stuff of films. Early European explorers called it El Dorado or the City of Z. Hundreds of them ventured into the Amazon's dark interior searching for its legendary cities, which were reputed to possess gigantic riches.


Also, most scientists in the last century thought that the soil was too poor and ecological conditions too severe for anything other than tribes and small farmers to have existed there. However, the discoveries over the recent period are seriously challenging this view.


Circular Geoglyph Amazon

© Google Earth

Circular geoglyph Amazon.



Since 2010, some 450 geoglyphs have been discovered. (Geoglyphs are huge geometric patterns carved into the landscape, which can often only be seen from the air.) The new findings in the Amazon show perfectly designed circles, lines and shapes, which are accompanied by huge mounds and massive ditches stretching over a 155 mile (250 kms) area.

Fazenda Colorada

© Sanna Saunaluoma, Antiquity Journal

Aerial photograph and plan of earthworks at Fazenda Colorada made up of clear geometric shapes. Excavations suggest inhabitants lived in the three-sided square.



Dr Jose Iriarte from Exeter University, UK, told the BBC that, "This evidence suggests that Amazonia may have been inhabited by large, numerous, complex and hierarchical societies." Certainly, to have carried out such large scale projects it would have been necessary to have a huge, housed labor force, perhaps as large as the Egyptians used to build the pyramids.

Indeed, Alceu Ranzi, a geographer and paleontologist with the Federal University in the Brazilian state of Acre earlier told Archeology News Network that regions of the Amazon were home to civilizations that may have rivaled those of the ancient West. "It could be something as important as an unknown Roman empire, or a Mesopotamia."


Some researchers estimate that as many as 90,000 people may have lived in the complexes which make up the ruins around the geoglyphs. Anthropologist Michael Heckenberger, who has been working for some twenty years on Brazil's Xingu river, a few hundred miles away, believes he has uncovered "garden cities" of 50,000 inhabitants, which were "small and medium residential areas built around central plazas and interconnected by elaborate road systems."


Aerial photograph of ditches at Fazenda Parana

© Edison Caetano, Antiquity Journal

Aerial photograph of ditches at Fazenda Parana.



Ancient Origins reported last year that a study published in the journal, , says that the geoglyphs and surrounding constructions predate the existence of the Amazonian rain forest. Analysis of sediment shows that the climate was far different 6,000 years ago, when it would have been much drier and unsuitable for a jungle ecosystem. That changed about 2-3,000 years ago. Until now the geoglyphs and constructions were thought to have been built around 200 AD, but since they predate the forest, it means that a very ancient civilization existed there before 1,000 BC.

Many believe that the ancient civilization remained in the area during the climate changes and created an elaborate system of land and water management combined with deforestation. This is a key issue which scientists want to investigate with the drone research, in order to see if there is any relevance or lessons to be gained for today's destruction of the rain forest.


Some archeologists think there could be as many as 2,000 other structures hidden below what is now the dense canopy of the rain forest. While some of the shapes and mounds were first seen back in 1999, exploration has proved difficult and is expected to continue for some time to come. The drones will be a major contributor to accelerating this process. Equipped with lidar instruments, which digitally remove the trees from images, the drones should be able to penetrate larger areas of the forest and help researchers pinpoint places to explore on the ground. It may also go a long way to answering the questions about the size and sophistication of the civilization.


The BBC reports that the new project was announced at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in San Jose. It will be a British-led team, which just won a 1.7m Euro (£1.25m; $1.9m) grant from the European Research Council.


Chomsky: We Are All – Fill in the Blank.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.


Sinkhole injures two in Surprise, Arizona


© Surprise Police Department

A sinkhole in Surprise injured two when their car fell into it Friday afternoon, according to officials.



A sinkhole in Surprise sent two people to the hospital Friday and forced an overnight road closure, authorities said.

The sinkhole on 163rd Avenue about a 1/2 mile north of Grand Avenue was about as wide as a lane of traffic. Attempts to repair the damage were underway Friday afternoon.


Two people received minor injuries when the vehicle they were in entered the sinkhole, according to a Surprise Fire Department official. The pair were taken to Banner Del E. Webb Medical Center in Sun City for treatment.


Traffic was initially moving through the area with restrictions. Officials closed 163rd Avenue overnight and the road was expected to be off limits to traffic at least through this morning.


It wasn't clear when repairs would be complete and the road restrictions would be cleared.


Chomsky: We Are All – Fill in the Blank.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.


34 wildfires reported across Arkansas


© THV11

Wildfire threatens Rush Historic District of Buffalo National River



34 wildfires were reported in Arkansas over the weekend.

According to the Arkansas Forestry Commission, those wildfires burned across 492 acres.


Air tankers dropped water on fires in Hot Spring and Clark Counties.


The wildfire danger remains moderate for most of Arkansas and low risk on the northeast side of the state.


There are currently no active burn bans.


Chomsky: We Are All – Fill in the Blank.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.


34 wildfires reported in Arkansas


© THV11

Wildfire threatens Rush Historic District of Buffalo National River



34 wildfires were reported in Arkansas over the weekend.

According to the Arkansas Forestry Commission, those wildfires burned across 492 acres.


Air tankers dropped water on fires in Hot Spring and Clark Counties.


The wildfire danger remains moderate for most of Arkansas and low risk on the northeast side of the state.


There are currently no active burn bans.


Chomsky: We Are All – Fill in the Blank.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.


The FDA is hiding scientific fraud, and you should be pissed

FDA

© io9



When the FDA encounters instances of scientific misconduct, it buries the evidence. A recent investigation sheds light on the extent of the problem.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration - the agency tasked with protecting public health via regulation of everything from food safety to prescription drugs - occasionally encounters serious instances of misconduct in biomedical research. According to an investigation published in the latest issue of the these cases include




...falsification or submission of false information... problems with adverse events reporting... protocol violations... inadequate or inaccurate recordkeeping... failure to protect the safety of patients and/or issues with oversight or informed consent... [among other violations]




Study author Charles Seife, an acclaimed science writer and professor of journalism at NYU, writes that "the FDA has no systematic method of communicating these findings to the scientific community, leaving open the possibility that research misconduct detected by a government agency goes unremarked in the peer-reviewed literature." In the course of his investigation, he identified fifty seven published clinical trials for which an FDA inspection of the trial site had turned up "significant evidence" for at least of the aforementioned problems.

The problem with these problems is that they are not reported. At least, not in any meaningful way. "The FDA has no systematic method of communicating these findings to the scientific community," writes Seife, "leaving open the possibility that research misconduct detected by a government agency goes unremarked in the peer-reviewed literature." By failing to make this information readily available, the FDA compromises the ability of scientists, doctors, and the public - that means you - to remain informed about scientific trials fraught with misconduct.


The most troubling thing about the FDA's reticence about these matters is that it is characterized by more than silence. As Seife writes in a supplemental piece published at Slate, the FDA is engaged in "active deception." This is something the FDA has been accused of in the past. In his piece, Seife describes the process by which he and his students dug up even more damning evidence of the FDA's surreptitious practices:




My students and I looked at FDA documents relating to roughly 600 clinical trials in which one of the researchers running the trial failed an FDA inspection. In only roughly 100 cases were we able to figure out which study, which drug, and which pharmaceutical company were involved. (We cracked a bunch of the redactions by cross-referencing the documents with clinical trials data, checking various other databases, and using carefully crafted Google searches.) For the other 500, the FDA was successfully able to shield the drugmaker (and the study sponsor) from public exposure.


It's not just the public that's in the dark. It's researchers, too. And your doctor. As I describe in the current issue of , my students and I were able to track down some 78 scientific publications resulting from a tainted study—a clinical trial in which FDA inspectors found significant problems with the conduct of the trial, up to and including fraud. In only three cases did we find any hint in the peer-reviewed literature of problems found by the FDA inspection. The other publications were not retracted, corrected, or highlighted in any way. In other words, the FDA knows about dozens of scientific papers floating about whose data are questionable—and has said nothing, leaving physicians and medical researchers completely unaware. The silence is unbroken even when the FDA itself seems shocked at the degree of fraud and misconduct in a clinical trial.


Such was the case with the so-called RECORD 4 study. RECORD 4 was one of four large clinical trials that involved thousands of patients who were recruited at scores of clinical sites in more than a dozen countries around the world. The trial was used as evidence that a new anti-blood-clotting agent, rivaroxaban, was safe and effective. The FDA inspected or had access to external audits of 16 of the RECORD 4 sites. The trial was a fiasco. At Dr. Craig Loucks' site in Colorado, the FDA found falsified data. At Dr. Ricardo Esquivel's site in Mexico, there was "systematic discarding of medical records" that made it impossible to tell whether the study drug was given to the patients. At half of the sites that drew FDA scrutiny—eight out of 16—there was misconduct, fraud, fishy behavior, or other practices so objectionable that the data had to be thrown out. The problems were so bad and so widespread that, contrary to its usual practice, the FDA declared the entire study to be "unreliable." Yet if you look in the medical journals, the results from RECORD 4 sit quietly in without any hint in the literature about falsification, misconduct, or chaos behind the scenes. This means that physicians around the world are basing life-and-death medical decisions on a study that the FDA knows is simply not credible.




Read the rest of Seife's piece at Slate. Read the results of his and his students' investigation in the latest issue of JAMA. Seife has also made all primary documents for the exposé available on his website.

Chomsky: We Are All – Fill in the Blank.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.