Focused on providing independent journalism.

Monday, 16 February 2015

Britain's Roswell: the truth behind the Rendlesham Forest UFO incident


© Eyevine



The truth is out there? The Rendlesham UFO incident is the subject of a new film



Dubbed "Britain's Roswell", the Rendlesham Forest incident, which took place over a series of nights in December 1980, continues to fascinate UFO enthusiasts and conspiracy theorists. It is easy to understand why. Consider the following three statements, for example:


1) "This was not some vague 'lights in the sky' sighting - the UFO actually landed." - Nick Pope, a Ministry of Defence employee from 1985 to 2006.


2) "When I arrived [at the scene], it was going in and out through the trees and at one stage it was hovering." - Sgt. Adrian Bustinza, a security police commander who investigated the incident at the time.


3) "Okay, we're looking at the thing; we're probably about two to three hundred yards away. It looks like an eye winking at you... And the flash is so bright to the starscope that it almost burns your eye." - Taken from the Halt tape, recorded on December 27 1980 by United States Air Force lieutenant colonel Charles Halt.


Only last month, a dog walker uploaded fresh footage of unidentified lights in the sky above Rendlesham Forest, while a new film on the subject, produced by long-time Suffolk resident and Rendlesham Forest incident expert Daniel Simpson, has recently been released. There is even an official UFO trail for walkers to follow through Rendlesham Forest. But what actually happened? And, 35 years after the event, are we any closer to unravelling the mystery?





The start of the Rendlesham Forest UFO trail



As the years have passed, the facts have become increasingly hazy, as statements change and new witnesses come forward. But what we do know for sure is that, in the early hours of December 26 1980, US military personnel (sections of the US Air Force were temporarily stationed at RAF bases in Woodbridge and Bentwaters) spotted strange lights above Rendlesham Forest.

One of these men, John Burroughs, accompanied by his supervisor and one other individual, went to investigate the blue, red, orange and white lights. In his subsequent witness statement, published in 1981, Burroughs explains: "As we went down the east-gate road and the road that leads into the forest, the lights were moving back and they appeared to stop in a bunch of trees... Also, the woods lit up and you could hear the farm animals making a lot of noises, and there was a lot of movement in the woods. All three of us hit the ground and whatever it was started moving back towards the open field... We got up to a fence that separated the trees from the open field. You could see the lights down by a farmer's house. We climbed over the fence and started walking toward the red and blue lights and they just disappeared."


Jim Penniston, who accompanied Burroughs into Rendlesham Forest on December 26, claims to have encountered a craft, covered in hieroglyphic-like characters. "I estimated it to be about three metres tall and about three metres wide at the base," Penniston later explained. "No landing gear was apparent, but it seemed like she was on fixed legs. I moved a little closer. I had already taken all 36 pictures on my roll of film. I walked around the craft, and finally, I walked right up to the craft. I noticed the fabric of the shell was more like a smooth, opaque, black glass."


Burroughs does not recall this. Indentations on the forest floor, as well as damage to the trees in the area where the lights had been spotted, were found the following morning, however. Radiation levels recorded at the site of the indentations were also unusually high.


In the book , which was published last year, Penniston writes: "I left the forest a different man... I was in awe of the technology and yes, a knowing that it was not an aircraft which could have been manufactured in 1980 or even now." Both Penniston and Burroughs have since suffered from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.


Two nights later, a different set of military personnel experienced a similar series of events. On this occasion, when the lights were spotted, Lieutenant Colonel Charles Halt was prepared. A pragmatic character, Halt intended to disprove the wild rumours swirling around RAF bases Woodbridge and Bentwaters. Arming himself with a recording device, he set out to investigate. The subsequent audio tape is now considered one of the most valuable pieces of evidence in the Rendlesham Forest incident.


[embedded content]




The transcript of the tape runs to some 18 minutes but includes statements from Halt such as: "I see it too... it's back again... it's coming this way... there's no doubt about it... this is weird... it looks like an eye winking at you... it almost burns your eyes... he's coming toward us now... now we're observing what appears to be a beam coming down to the ground... one object still hovering over Woodbridge base... beaming down". Halt has since given interviews in which he claims that these occurrences were picked up by British radar. "I didn't know this until recently," he told AOL News. "Because people have come forward after they've retired. There were two radar confirmations."

The following night, December 28, one final group of men claim to have encountered something out of the ordinary in Rendlesham Forest. Larry Warren, an 18-year-old soldier who was not even at either RAF base on the night of the first incident, was sent out on patrol with Sgt Adrian Bustinza and a number of other military personnel. Sometime after 11pm, the men departed their trucks and headed towards the field where lights had been seen on the previous two nights.


There, Warren claims to have seen "disaster preparedness officers out here with geiger counters, going in an almost half-clockwise motion around this thing on the ground." A small red light was then seen approaching from the direction of the coast. "It moved in a downward arc, so fast. [It] stopped and hovered about 20 feet off the ground," said Warren. "It was the size of a basketball, [an] American basketball. [It was] self-illuminated, not quite red, yet that's the closest I can describe it."


Things were about to get even stranger, though. This red light suddenly exploded and a craft appeared on the forest floor. According to Warren, it had "no windows, no markings, no flag or country of origin. Nothing. You could hardly look at it head on, and if you looked at it through the side of your peripheral vision you'd get a shape of it... and there it was, clear as a bell."



© Ian Ridpath/NoW

A 1983 News of the World headline about Rendlesham sightings



At this stage, Warren and Bustinza were asked to retreat by a senior man. From a distance, they then claim to have witnessed Wing Commander Gordon Williams approach the craft and encounter some alien being with "what looked like eyes, facial features, bright clothing and some other device." Warren is clear that a "silent stand-off", rather than any communication, took place.

At around 4.30am, Warren returned to his base but Bustinza claims to have seen the craft depart. "When it took off, it was, like, hovering. It went up and, like, took off at about a forty-five-degree angle, and if you would have blinked, you would have missed it... And we got a cold draft of air that lasted about a good ten seconds. You know, like when you get a good blow of dust or wind. No noise though; I do remember that."


It is understood that almost half of all UFO correspondence directed at the Ministry of Defence relates to the Rendlesham Forest incident. Despite claims of a cover-up, the MoD's stance has never wavered. It states: "No evidence was found of any threat to the defence of the United Kingdom, and no further investigations were carried out. No further information has come to light which alters our view that the sightings of these lights was of no defence significance."


Daniel Simpson takes a different view, however. The director of The Rendlesham UFO Incident, a fictionalised account of the story set in the modern day and filmed on location in Rendlesham Forest, is convinced that either there has been a military cover-up or that something extra-terrestrial occurred in December 1980. And moreover, he believes he has uncovered further evidence to prove it. While filming in Rendlesham Forest - "It does have a very strong atmosphere of something strange" - he asked the Forestry Commission to investigate a series of hatches, which Simpson describes as "mysterious".


"I got the Forestry Commission to tow one of those hatches off with a four wheel drive and there's a ladder going down," he explains, as we discuss his film. "Now, they will tell you that those are drainage systems for the airfield but it's a very elaborate drainage system."





A drawing from Jim Penniston's original witness statement



Simpson believes that "the twin bases [RAF Woodbridge and Bentwaters] are connected by tunnels underneath, which isn't that far out a thing to suggest, because a lot of these bases do have an underground facility, especially as it's a nuclear facility. You don't keep nuclear weapons on ground level, they have to drop down."

He continues: "I recently heard a very interesting story of a guy that went up to the Bentwaters air base and, because it's privately owned, some of those buildings are rented out to people. A company up there wanted to have their internet sorted out and this guy dug down and - he was a telecom guy - he came back and he was sheet white. He couldn't believe it. He said he'd just come across these cables, two foot down, and they were cables delivering such a powerful internet connection - but they were cables from 1980. I haven't ever told anyone that story. They [the cables] were from 1980 and yet they were so in advance of what we've even got now. I'm told that all the time what we get [technologically] is much behind what they [the military] actually know."


So what, I wonder, is the truth? Simpson appears conflicted about whether this is a military cover-up at a nuclear facility or something even more alarming. "I honestly believe something very strange went on there and I believe that somewhere is the evidence to prove it but that's hidden away. I think it's an extra-terrestrial encounter. I do."


I put a series of theories to Simpson, which I hope might explain away the idea that extra-terrestrial life landed in a forest in Suffolk 35 years ago. But he bats them all away. Could the lights have come from nearby Orford Ness lighthouse, for example? "The lighthouse theory is rubbish," he scoffs. "Lighthouses don't fly down into forests, split up into five different lights and zap off into space at Mach-3. They don't move through the trees and get mistaken by up to 20 witnesses from the United States Air Force."





Daniel Simpson's film, The Rendlesham UFO Incident, was shot on location in Rendlesham Forest



Chomsky: We Are All – Fill in the Blank.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.


Propaganda: CIA fears "hostile nations" manipulating weather to trigger droughts and floods


If it seems like it never stops raining, blame the Russians. Or even the North Koreans. CIA chiefs fear hostile nations are trying to manipulate the world's weather, a conference heard.

A leading academic has told how he got a mysterious phone call asking whether foreign countries could be triggering droughts or flooding. Professor Alan Robock, from Rutgers University in New Jersey, said: 'Consultants working for the CIA rang and said we'd like to know if someone is controlling the world's climate would we know about it?

'Of course they were also asking - if we control someone else's climate would they then know about it.'


The professor is one of many scientists from around the world are actively looking at manipulating the weather as a way of combating climate change.


Geoengineering techniques range from cloud seeding, in which chemicals are sprayed by planes trigger rainfall, to shooting mirrors into space to reflect sunlight and cool the Earth.


Professor Robock told the callers that any attempts to meddle with the weather on a large scale would be detectable.




However, he told the American Association for the Advancement of Science's annual conference in San Jose, that the weather has been weaponised in the past.

During the Vietnam War, US scientists tried to increase rainfall to hamper the enemy's progress by spraying particles into the clouds. And the CIA seeded clouds over Cuba 'to make it rain and ruin the sugar harvest'.


Asked how he felt when he got the call, the professor said: 'Scared. I'd learned of lots of other things the CIA had done that haven't followed the rules and that wasn't how I wanted my tax money spent. I think this research has to be open and international, so there isn't any question of using it for hostile purposes.'




To add to the intrigue, the CIA is believed to have helped fund a major report into geoengineering.

Published last week by the prestigious US National Academy of Sciences, the report mentions the 'US intelligence community' in its list of sponsors, alongside organisations such as Nasa.


Professor Robock said the CIA had told one of his colleagues it wanted to fund the report, but apparently did not want this fact to be too obvious.


He said: 'The CIA is a major funder of the National Academies report so that makes me really worried who is going to be in control.'


He added that the tension created by any large-scale meddling in the climate could escalate to such an extent that it would end in all-out war.


The professor said: 'If one country wants to control the climate in one way, and another doesn't want it or if they try to shoot down the planes...if there is no agreement it could result in terrible consequences.'


Chomsky: We Are All – Fill in the Blank.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.


Russian opposition plans 'anti-crisis' rally in Moscow


© RIA Novosti / Vladimir Pesnya

Alexei Navalny



The opposition coalition Solidarity has submitted a request for a major march against the authorities' anti-crisis measures on March 1. Moscow City Hall is yet to grant approval for the rally.

The news about the application was reported by one of Solidarity's key activists, Sergey Davidis. He told Interfax the event would be named simply 'Spring' and the maximum turnout is estimated at 100,000. The main objective of the march is to express discontent with the anti-crisis program of the authorities, Davidis elaborated.




The head of Moscow's directorate for regional security, Aleksey Mayorov, told reporters on Monday that various political movements had submitted six different applications for mass rallies on March 1 and added that it was early to talk about any particular plans. According to Russian law, civil servants have three days to officially permit or ban the rally.

On Sunday one of the main figures behind the planned rally - the leader of the Party of Progress Aleksey Navalny - was detained for promoting the march.


Navalny and another anti-corruption activist - Aleksey Lyaskin - were apprehended on Sunday evening in the Moscow Metro and released at about midnight after spending six hours in a police station, TASS reported quoting the Moscow press service of the Interior Ministry. Police said that the detained were violating public order.




Lyaskin tweeted that law enforcers registered them both and asked to appear in the station on the next day in order to complete all forms. Navalny also posted a tweet about the accident, calling it "ridiculous and illegal" and adding a photo of himself at a Metro station with uniformed officers in the background.

Задержание в метро выглядит смешнее всех видов задержаний. Просто стою в вестибюле и меня охраняют 15 человек http://bit.ly/1FjP6vc


— Alexey Navalny (@navalny) February 15, 2015



In addition to allegedly breaching the public order Navalny violated the conditions of the house arrest he currently must remain under.

In late December, Aleksey Navalny and his brother Oleg were convicted of large-scale embezzlement and received sentences - suspended for Aleksey and incarcerated for Oleg, who was a key suspect in the case. However, the sentence has not yet come into full force which means that the prevention measure for Aleksey cannot be changed and he should remain under house arrest.


Navalny has protested about this situation by walking out of his apartment and cutting off the special surveillance device. Each time he was detained and returned home without any additional remands.


Chomsky: We Are All – Fill in the Blank.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.


FLASHBACK: In strange twist, Venezuela arrests '7 police agents' and rabbi's bodyguard in connection with Caracas synagogue attack




Anti-Semitic graffiti sprayed on the walls of the Caracas synagogue



Venezuelan investigators on Sunday said seven police agents and four civilians were arrested in connection with an attack on a synagogue that sparked international condemnation.

The Venezuelan public prosecutor's office said the civilians included at least one security official from the synagogue and that all had been captured in raids over the weekend.


"These people were apprehended during raids carried out between Saturday and the early hours of Sunday in different parts of Caracas. They will all be charged by the Public Prosecutor's office," the office said in a statement.


synagogue caracas

© Unknown

The hate criminalists desecrated the temple in the synagogue



Armed men broke into Venezuela's Tiferet synagogue last week, daubing the walls with slogans like "Jews get out" and destroyed religious objects.

The attack produced a deluge of condemnation of President Hugo Chavez, a vocal critic of Israeli foreign policy who last month expelled Israel's ambassador over the war in Gaza. Members of the U.S. Congress said in a letter that Chavez had fostered a climate of fear against the Jewish community, and the World Jewish Congress was also critical.


Chavez insists he respects all religions and condemned the attack on the synagogue, which he blamed on armed groups opposed to his government. This week he said investigators had found a videotape of the assailants in the temple and predicted arrests would quickly follow.


Representatives of World Jewish Congress met with Venezuelan officials on Friday and said the government had promised to clamp down on anti-Semitic acts.


Despite the government's assurances, some Chavez supporters are openly anti-Semitic and graffiti has become a common sight on Caracas' streets since the Israel's offensive in Gaza, which killed nearly 1,300 people.


Chomsky: We Are All – Fill in the Blank.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.


EU leaders worried about Syriza 'Virus' spreading across Europe




The Greek Solidarity anti-austerity protests are spreading.



As anti-austerity protests continue to build in numbers across Europe (and not just in Spain where Podemos now holds a commanding poll lead over the status quo) reports that Greek parliamentary spokesman for Syriza, Nikos Filis notes "The wave of protests indicates a new beginning... And it scares the dominant forces in Europe. Because Syriza virus can spread and in their communities." And we suspect that is indeed the Eurogroup's greatest fear.

Via AVGI (Google Translate),



The demonstrations of solidarity with the Greek people against the austerity policies and enrolled in a European perspective changes and upheavals. This scares the dominant forces in Europe. Because the "virus" SYRIZA can spread and in their communities,"said the parliamentary spokesman of SYRIZA Nick Phillis.


"The wave of protests indicates a new beginning because SYRIZA virus can spread to the rest of Europe, as solidarity rallies in Greek people are against the austerity policies that degrade the lives of European citizens. The protests shall be entered in a European perspective changes and upheavals. And it scares the dominant forces in Europe. Because SYRIZA virus can spread and in their communities."


Commenting on Juncker statements and attitude of Europeans, in recent times, given the current Eurogroup for the Greek issue, Nikos Phillis speaks of "democracy deficit in Europe" and notes:


"They have behind them saying in recent days, seems to insist on completion of the Memorandum program harden their stance. This element is important to take account of people and Greece and Europe. Most likely not end today, having a horizon until 28/2. It is a political issue, not a technical one, because they put issues not related financial interest, such as labor. And on the part of creditors is not the issue of a minimum wage only, is subject a comprehensive, collective bargaining rights of a system, a European acquis in Greece is not the case. When elections take place in a country, we must respect the will of citizens, it is sovereignty issue. But the loan agreement is a bilateral relationship and the Greece and its creditors, the memorandum is a relationship that the Greece and has to do with the domestic legislation. Therefore, it says Juncker and others in Europe is not right, why do not question multilateral European treaties, but a treaty that its internal legislation. This raises issues of sovereignty and democratic representation. The negotiations should take into account the political change in our country. If not taken into account, this shows the perception in Europe for democracy, indicates lack of democracy in Europe ".



Chomsky: We Are All – Fill in the Blank.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.


Libya may halt pumping oil as violence intensifies


© Reuters / Ismail Zitouny



Libya's National Oil Corporation (NOC) says it could suspend production at all its oilfields if the government fails to curb the rising number of attacks by militants.

The company is worried about the safety of its employees and the possibility staff might leave the extraction sites after repeated armed attacks. NOC wants the country's Defense Ministry to protect the oil pumping facilities.


"If these incidents continue, National Oil Corp will regrettably be forced to stop all operations at all fields in order to preserve the lives of employees," the company warned on its website.




There have been increasing attacks on Libya's oil facilities by armed groups, and the violence reached its peak last week. On Saturday a bomb exploded at a pipeline carrying crude from the country's largest oilfield El Sarir, following Friday's attacks on the nearby Makruk and Bahi oil fields. Nine guards were killed and three workers were taken hostage in an attack on Mabruk earlier this month.

Various militant groups are tearing Libya apart in the worst wave of violence since the 2011 uprising that overthrew the country's leader Muammar Gaddafi. Two de-facto governments are currently acting in the country.

Libya, a member of OPEC, which has Africa's largest proven oil reserves at about 48 billion barrels, was exporting 1.6 million barrels per day before Gaddafi was overthrown. Since then oil production fell from an average of just 430,000 barrels per day in 2014 to an average of 350,000 barrels per day in January 2015.


Brent crude finished last week up 7 percent and up 32 percent from its lowest point this year in mid-January at $61.52 a barrel due to the news from Libya.


Chomsky: We Are All – Fill in the Blank.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.


Outrage as UK's Selfridges department store installs 'anti-homeless' spikes


The UK's biggest department store, Selfridges, has provoked outrage after it installed "disgusting" anti-homeless spikes outside its Manchester branch.

"Anti-homeless" metal spikes placed outside the Manchester department store make it impossible for homeless people to sleep there.


Residents in the area have confirmed homeless people "used to sleep" in the exact same place where the spikes are now situated.


This isn't the first time these "inhumane" spikes have sparked controversy in the UK.


Last June, the metal spikes caused a stir on social media when they were placed outside luxury apartments in London.


Following public outrage, London Mayor Boris Johnson ordered the "ugly, self-defeating and stupid" fixtures be removed from the buildings.


The spikes outside the London apartments were removed following protests and a petition which reached over 130,000 signatures.


Furious campaigners have launched a fresh petition against the "intimidating" spikes outside the Manchester department store.


Academic Cathy Urquhart, who launched the change.org petition, said: "We should be looking after the homeless, not demonizing and scapegoating them."


Urquhart told the she was "shocked" when she saw the spikes.


A petition signatory, Richie Young from Blackpool, commented on the page: "Being homeless is not a crime."


"Damn this Government of the Rich for the Rich," Young added.


"If a company of this size and wealth can offer no better contribution to Manchester's homeless problem than to build themselves a fortress then I won't spend my money there," a signatory from Manchester said.


However, a spokesperson for Selfridges told IBTimes UK that the spikes were put in place "as part of a number of measures to reduce litter and smoking outside the store's team entrance, following customer complaints."




Jacqui McClusckey, director of policy and communications for Homeless Link, said: "Sleeping on the streets is dangerous, bad for your health and individuals need support."


Chomsky: We Are All – Fill in the Blank.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.