Focused on providing independent journalism.

Monday, 2 March 2015

Fireballs seen streaking over South Indian state of Kerala

People all over the state were in the grip of panic as balls of fire streaked across the skies on Friday night. The fireballs were seen after 10 pm and in many places, mild tremors and thunder sounds accompanying the fire balls escalated apprehensions among the people.

While the phenomenon was first noticed in Ernakulam district, people from various parts of the state also reported seeing the phenomenon. Minister Adoor Prakash said that there was nothing to be concerned. Earthquake monitoring devices in six districts have not recorded anything unusual, said Ernakulam Collector M G Rajamanikyam. Other agencies such as ISRO and monitoring units of the Navy have also reported nothing unusual.


[embedded content]




Most of the unofficial pictures that are doing the rounds are copies from websites and social media saw imaginations running riot with users even commenting that the sky was falling down in pieces. Many of these pictures were padded with background shots of Kochi to make them look authentic.

People in Kolenchery and Paravur have reported that they have seen some objects falling out of the sky while people across Kottayam and Kozhikode also reported the night sight. According to descriptions, it is believed that the fireballs could have been disintegrating meteors, said Dr K.Mohan Kumar, Professor at the Department of Atmospheric Sciences, CUSAT.


Dr Rajagopal Kammath, a scientist, suggested that there could be three explanations for the fire balls:


1.China's Norad 4063 is believed to have re-entered into earth's atmosphere and since February 23, the disintegrating pieces of the satellite has been lighting up the night sky in many parts of the world. This is the most possible reason. A satellite had fallen in Siberia recently and remnants of that satellite could have caused the streaks.


2.The fireball could be a phenomenon called ball lightening.


3.There is a possibility that the streaks could have been part of a meteor storm, Gamma Normids. Scientists had predicted the event from February 23 to 27.


The sound that people heard was due to sonic boom.


Travelers to Europe soon to be subjected to a biometric dragnet as part of the 'smart borders' pilot test

biometric data

© unknown



Travel becomes truly ominous...

In a trend that isn't wholly surprising, EU Observer reports:



US citizens and other non-EU nationals who enter Europe will be asked to have their faces image-captured and fingerprints scanned upon arrival at a half-dozen major airports. [emphasis added]



This "biometric dragnet" is the pilot test for the EU's new "smart borders" packages. The test portion will run March - September 2015, for starters. The commission originally proposed this package in 2013 but pulled it and began revising. While there is some opposition, the experiment is shortly underway.

The captures include fingerprint scans, iris scans and facial recognition scans for all forms of European travel - road, train, sea and air.


Of course, what's usual for such programs - travelers can refuse... for now. But officials are letting travelers know through the media that it will become mandatory in time .


Arlanda (Sweden), Charles de Gaulle (France), Frankfurt (Germany), Lisbon (Portugal), Madrid (Spain), and Schiphol (Netherlands) are the test airports. The multi-million euro project is still in the draft stages but nevertheless, is set to go...now. The document notes:


Should traveller participation be lower than expected, there would be a high risk that the results of the tests would be biased or would not reflect reality.


A special token is expected for frequent travelers to complete journeys without the inconvenience of the future traveler to Europe...


Arlanda, Charles de Gaulle, and Madrid airports will capture facial recognition images from passengers stepping off flights. Lisbon is "tickled" - yes, tickled - to capture iris pattern scans, live at the same time as facial captures. Moving trains from Paris (Gare du Nord) and Lasi (Romania) will house border guards who will take fingerprint scans. Travelers at Lasi will be compelled for their facial images.


Again, this practice will include other modes of travel where in some areas, iris scans will be taken. For instance, iris scans will be taken from drivers (willing at first) on roads leading into border towns Udvar in Hungary and Sculeni in Romania. The article notes that "drivers should also expect live face scans in Sculeni."


Roads leading into Kipoi Evrou in Greece and Vaalimaa in Finland will compel drivers for fingerprints. "The traveller[sic] will walk up to the border guard or be one of the first persons to be called by the border guard," the document notes. Certain cars and buses will be "pulled aside" in a waiting area for the duration of the experiment.


Lastly, Helsinki (Finland), Port of Piraeus (Greece), Gerbourg (France), and Genova (Italy) are the seaports and ship areas participating in the data collection.


There is, of course, the assurance that all data will be depersonalised, kept local and destroyed afterward with only a limited retention period. The only data "risk" in their consideration being that certain member states won't comply with data protection guidelines. Notably, eu-LISA is the EU agency that will manage this large-scale undertaking with systems that in current use by EU border guards and law enforcement. Reports come out July 15th and November.


The "full monty" biometric trend is likely to burgeon at U.S. airports soon, if not already - as this is a major global goal. The events of September 11 were used to justify major spending for biometric measures worldwide. Or rather, the extra push for projects that were already underway.


From EU Observer:



The package includes the Entry/Exit System (EES) and the Registered Travellers Programme (RTP).




Both rely on the collection, storage, and processing of biometric data to enhance border control checks on any non-EU national entering the EU.




EES is meant to identify and prevent people from overstaying their visas.



A witness reported to us of a promotional flight video depicting biometric scanners at Atlanta, GA International Airport. Sure enough, all the equipment was set up at the airport in the summer of 2012, but was not yet in use. Feel free to comment if you know where the airport stands currently on biometric use.

Hat tip: Alan Watt reporting at Cutting Through the Matrix, March 1, 2015 'Blurb'


Bill O'Reilly take four: Fox News admits his tall tales about Irish terrorists

Bill O'Reilly

© Reuters / Lisa Miller



Fox News issued a mea culpa for one of anchor Bill O'Reilly's too-good-to-be-true stories ‒ but not for all his anecdotes that critics complain are fake. The controversial talk show host has been under fire for recollections of his reporting career.

In his 2013 book, , O'Reilly wrote, "I've seen soldiers gun down unarmed civilians in Latin America, Irish terrorists kill and maim their fellow citizens in Belfast with bombs."


Asked about O'Reilly's statements Friday, a spokesman told the that O'Reilly was not an eyewitness to any bombings or injuries in Northern Ireland. Instead, he was shown photos of bombings by Protestant police officers.




O'Reilly traveled to Northern Ireland in 1984 to research a book about the Troubles, according to Fox News. But he never completed the tome, and the Post said it's unclear whether he reported on his visit for any news organization.

At the time, he was working for Boston station WCVB, but his then-boss, Philip S. Balboni, told the Post that O'Reilly covered only local news and did commentary for the station.


In a recent radio interview, the Fox News favorite told syndicated host Hugh Hewitt only:


When Hewitt asked him if he was in physical danger, O'Reilly said no.




The Fox News host has come under fire of late for other stories that he is accused of making up or embellishing. Another anecdote O'Reilly recounted during the Hewitt interview ‒ about covering the 1992 Rodney King riots in Los Angeles ‒ was disputed by his former CBS News colleagues.

He has been caught repeatedly lying about being present at the suicide of a key JFK assassination investigation witness. The account of was first mentioned in 'Killing Kennedy,' his bestselling investigative book published in 2012. He has also recounted the incident on his Fox News program.


Multiple witnesses and former colleagues say his vivid description is completely untrue.


The accusations against the journalist began in late February, when Mother Jones journalists David Corn and Daniel Schulman called into question O'Reilly's account about his heroic actions while covering the Falklands War in Argentina in 1982 ‒ the two reporters wrote.



© Screenshot from youtube.com



O'Reilly then dedicated an entire 10-minute segment of the next day's episode of the O'Reilly Factor to tearing Corn apart for the article, and calling their publication

aggressively denied the accusations against its star host at the beginning. In a statement to the , a spokeswoman for the network said that claims casting doubt on his recollections are "nothing more than an orchestrated campaign by far left advocates


"Bill O'Reilly has already addressed several claims leveled against him," the spokeswoman said."Responding to the unproven accusation du jour has become an exercise in futility. maintains its staunch support of O'Reilly, who is no stranger to calculated onslaughts."


began backing away from its total support of O'Reilly when Politico's Media Matters blog published a report that the host ‒ who worked for a Dallas TV station in 1977 when George de Mohrenschildt committed suicide in Florida ‒ was actually in Dallas, not Palm Beach at the time the JFK assassination investigation witness died.




The network did not respond to the blog's request for comments, and referred others to O'Reilly's publishing company for the 2012 book.

' admission that its host was only shown photos of bombings by Protestant police officers, and was not, in fact, an eyewitness to any bombings or injuries in Northern Ireland, is the first time the network has vindicated O'Reilly's critics in any way.


Authoritarians in action: How the US media frames the vaccine debate

vaccines

© Joe Raedle/Getty Images



Major US news media have presented a grossly distorted and misleading interpretation of vaccines and their relationship to public health since early January. These journalistic organs have suggested the recent measles outbreak in the Western US has been a crisis of monumental proportions.

This flagrant and cynical sensationalism has become a foundation for intense advocacy on behalf of the pharmaceutical corporate and regulatory cartel targeting —a founding principal of modern medical practice and personal freedom. Keeping in mind the close to 300 vaccine products now in the pharmaceutical industry's pipeline,[1] closer analysis of "measles outbreak" press coverage suggests a conscious effort by corporate news media to virtually banish such notions and practices from the public mind. A news media dependent on over $1 billion in advertising dollars from big pharma must almost by necessity indulge their clients' broader agenda.


An impartial journalistic approach to the question of vaccination and personal choice would provide equal and unprejudiced airing of "both sides," in addition to the varied grey areas in the debate, from the corporate and statist entities flying the banner of mandatory vaccination to cautious segments of the citizenry voicing reservations toward such technology alongside the foremost prerogative of personal choice.


A LexisNexis search of US newspaper and wire service articles from December 28, 2015—the official start date of the California measles outbreak—to February 8, 2015 [2] using the search terms "measles" and "vaccination" yields 799 press releases or wire stories and 746 newspaper articles and opinion pieces. Much of this coverage predictably emphasizes the array of vaccine-friendly assumptions and pronouncements from entities abetting the pharmaceutical industry's long-term profit-specific objectives.


For example, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is, alongside the Food and Drug Administration, the most powerful bureaucratic arm utilized by the global pharmaceutical cartel to elicit compliance with the federal vaccine schedule for children from the medical profession and broader population. Of the article sample referenced above, close to one-third (517) reference the "Centers for Disease Control" or "CDC" in their text, suggesting citation of the agency and its policies to persuasively instruct readers on vaccine efficacy and safety.


In contrast, the same body of over 1,500 press releases, news stories and editorials reference "informed consent" only three times—and when the term is used it is done so either in passing or to disparage the practice itself. For example, Arthur Caplan, a professor of medicine at New York University, warns against doctors the practice of informed consent in regard to vaccines. "The science is unimpeachable," Caplan proclaims. " Vaccines do not cause autism; measles is dangerous and contagious; inoculating against the disease is neither pointless nor riskier than abstention." The physician then amazingly suggests that genuine informed consent - explaining how a vaccine such as Measles, Mumps, Rubella, which can severely injure, incapacitate, or kill the child patient - must be categorically replaced by the dissemination of pharmaceutical industry propaganda and half-truths. "Those doctors who counsel otherwise - who distort what patients need to know to preserve their health or that of their children - have crossed a bright red line. They have violated a patient's right to informed consent, which depends on accurate information."[3]


The foremost US organization advocating the fundamental doctrine of informed consent, the National Vaccine Information Center, is referenced a paltry 22 times in the sizable article sample. And while the NVIC routinely emphasizes that it is not "anti-vaccine" and merely advocates that patients or their parents fully understand the risks associated with the industrialized, "one size fits all" immunization process, it is nevertheless framed as the official voice of "anti-vaccination." A recent article from the data set is exemplary of this practice. "Members of the anti-vaccine movement said the public backlash had terrified many parents. 'People are now afraid they're going to be jailed,' said Barbara Loe Fisher, the president of the National Vaccine Information Center, a clearinghouse for resisters."[4]


Of the 746 articles published in newspapers, 143 are editorial and opinion pieces. Almost without exception each vigorously supports wide-scale vaccination, even proposing punitive measures for those clinging to informed consent and personal choice. Such uniform opinion among newsroom management provides a clear indication of exactly how warped the overall news coverage of the "measles outbreak" has been.


"If we're not willing to permanently exile anti-vaxxers from the public square," one opinion in the remarks, "we should at least make emergency provisions to do so. Anti-vaxxers should be made to understand that when there is a public-health emergency - such as a measles outbreak - they'll be quarantined for the duration."[5] "Those who refuse to vaccinate are wrong," the argues. "They endanger themselves and those around them."[6] "The growing anti-vaccination movement is one of the most frustrating developments of this decade," the similarly contends. "Some of the parents who mistrust vaccine are uneducated and have no access to pediatric counsel, but there's no excuse for the irresponsible parents who have access to the latest science yet irrationally fear that vaccines are not safe for their children."[7]


In an effort to console parents concerned about the very real possibility of vaccines causing autism, US government press releases and US news outlets alike reference a 1998 study authored by British physician and medical scientist Andrew Wakefield linking vaccination to Crohn's disease and autism. "Public health officials blame a decline in parents having their kids vaccinated that began after a now-thoroughly discredited 1998 British report alleged that common early childhood vaccinations triggered autism," the grouses. "Unfortunately, that discredited report continues to be cited by know-nothing celebrities and vapid New Age authors who broadly reject modern medicine. They do so even as life expectancy hits all-time highs and medical researchers make steady progress on many fronts."[8]


The US government's own public relations service—US Official News—likewise chimes in on Wakefield's alleged deceit. "A 1998 article in the medical journal The Lancet caused a firestorm of controversy when it was published and helped create the anti-vaccine movement that continues today," one US government press release reads. "There's only one problem - the article was later retracted by the publisher for being 'utterly false,' and the author, Andrew Wakefield, was found to have been paid big bucks by plaintiffs' lawyers."[9]


The fact that Wakefield's 1998 findings have been upheld in 19 peer-reviewed papers he has contributed to the literature between 1998 and 2010, in addition to 28 studies from other scientists around the world [10] has been consciously overlooked by US newspaper editors and other drug industry propagandists. That this key piece of disinformation - soundly rebutted in the published research - continues to be repeated by journalists and government publicists alike suggests the hardcore disinformation tactics deployed to perpetuate the misunderstanding and unwarranted faith the majority of US families continue to place in big pharma's immensely profitable vaccine agenda.


As direct result of this well-coordinated publicity campaign and resulting hysteria the legal right by which families may exercise informed consent is now under intense legal assault across the US. "Hearings to remove philosophical/conscientious exemptions to vaccine mandates have already taken place in Washington and Oregon," NVIC reports.



California, Maine, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Vermont all have bills already filed or press announcements of bills about to be filed to remove philosophical/conscientious exemptions. Maine, Minnesota and Texas have bills to substantially restrict philosophical/conscientious exemptions. Religious exemptions are also under attack. Maryland, New Jersey, Texas and Vermont have bills filed or announced to eliminate religious exemptions, and Illinois, New Mexico and Texas have bills filed or announced to unconstitutionally restrict religious exemptions.



In addition, Connecticut, Florida, Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New York, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, and West Virginia all have legislation underway to expand vaccine mandates.[11]

In light of the above one should be unsurprised at the mob-like antipathy toward "anti-vaxxers," and how the notions of personal liberty and informed consent have been made to appear increasingly bizarre by being effectively stricken from public discourse. The population has been expertly propagandized on the issue by medical practitioners, their professional associations, and regulatory agencies tethered to the pharmaceutical industry's agenda vis-a-vis a news media reliant on drug advertising revenue. With these observations in mind one must seriously ask themselves: In what meaningful way would a wholly scientific authoritarianism differ from what is witnessed in America today?


:


[1] Medicines in Development: A Report on the Prevention and Treatment of Disease Through Vaccines, Pharmaceutical Researchers and Manufacturers of America, 2013.


[2] Jennifer Zipprich, Kathleen Winter, et al, "Measles Outbreak - California, December 2014-February 2015," Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, February 20, 2015.


[3] Arthur Caplan, "Quacks Against Vaccines? Revoke Their Licenses,", February 8, 2015.


[4] Jack Healy and Michael Paulson, "Vaccine Critics Turn Defensive Over Measles," , January 31, 2015.


[5] Joel Mathis and Ben Boychuck, "The Vaccination Debate Continues,", February 9, 2015.


[6] "Washington Post: Measles in America," , February 3, 2015.


[7] "Disneyland's Measles is a Hard Lesson in How Vaccines Work," , January 29, 2015.


[8] "Anti-Vaccination Charlatans Take Toll on Public Health," , January 19, 2015.


[9] "Flashback: The Anti-Vaccine Movement and a Trial Lawyer-Funded Climate of Fear," Plus Media Solutions/US Official News, February 17, 2015.


[10] Joseph Mercola, "Why Medical Authorities Went to Such Extremes to Silence Dr. Andrew Wakefield," April 10, 2010, ,http://bit.ly/1DLTdgu


[11] "You Need to Act Now: Vaccine Exemptions and Mandates Threatened in Even More States," February 23, 2015, National Vaccine Information Center.


SOTT Exclusive: UFOs recorded in Mississippi, Leicestershire, and Philly


PA ufo

© MUFON

Witness image #1.



On February 26, UFOs were recorded on video and camera in Philadelphia, PA, and Lewisburg, MS. Angela Ashton, of Lewisburg, reported being in bed just after midnight when a "bright blinding light" shone through her window. She rushed outside to film it, describing it as triangle in shape and "at least the size of a football field". It reportedly hovered silently for about twenty minutes over a field before shooting straight up into the sky.

[embedded content]




Here's the video Ashton shot:

[embedded content]




That evening, a witness reports to MUFON that he was driving northeast of Philadelphia just after 7:30 p.m., when he "Noticed lights swirling around and had to look twice because there were wires on both sides of the street and directly above for electric buses ... I thought it was reflections of some sort at first." Upon pulling over to take a closer look, he took the pictures at the head of this article, and below, as well as video (bad quality, he says).

PA ufo

© MUFON

Witness image #2.



Early last month, on February third, in Earl Shilton, Leicestershire, a woman awoke at about 4:50 am to odd sounds. Not finding anything wrong in the house, she noticed two lights outside her window, which appeared to be hovering. The lights, which she captured on video, apparently were moving from side to side, merging together and coming apart, before shooting off at a very high speed.

[embedded content]




Avatar

Harrison Koehli (Profile)


Harrison Koehli hails from Edmonton, Alberta. A graduate of studies in music performance, Harrison is also an editor for Red Pill Press and has been interviewed on several North American radio shows in recognition of his contributions to advancing the study of ponerology. In addition to music and books, Harrison enjoys tobacco and bacon (often at the same time) and dislikes cell phones, vegetables, and fascists.



Highlighting Failed Policy in Syria, 'Moderate' Syrian Militia Armed With American Anti-Tank Missiles Announces Collapse



President Obama pictured during his first visit to the Pentagon since becoming President January 28, 2009. (Photo: DOD/public domain)


A U.S.-backed militia in Syria, touted by the Obama administration as a trusted "moderate" group and armed with American anti-tank missiles, is reportedly dissolving following a series of defeats by al-Qaeda aligned Jabhat al-Nusra—leaving the U.S.-led war on ISIS in further disarray.


The combatant group, Harakat al-Hazm, had been engaged in fierce clashes with Jabhat al-Nusra for months. The U.S.-allied militia was initially pushed from its northern Syrian headquarters in Idlib and suffered another defeat on Sunday at its new center of operations in Aleppo.


"Given what is happening on the Syrian front, offenses by the criminal regime with its cronies against Syria as a whole, and Aleppo specifically, and in an effort to stem the bloodshed of the fighters, the Hazm movement announces its dissolution," declared a statement from the group, cited by Daily Beast writer Jamie Dettmer.


The militia announced that its members would join a new coalition—the Shamiah Front—which is engaged in fighting against the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and, according to Dettmer, is "distrusted by Washington." According to the Guardian's Middle East Editor Ian Black, the front includes "hardline Salafist factions as well as more moderate brigades like the Muslim Brotherhood-linked Mujahideen Army and another U.S.-backed outfit."


Harakat al-Hazm is one of many Syrian militias that have received U.S. training and support, including shipments of anti-tank Tow missiles. Unverified reports are emerging on Twitter that their Tow missiles have been seized by al-Nusra fighters:



The announcement of Harakat al-Hazm's collapse coincides with the launch of a new U.S.-led program to train and arm Syrian combatants in Turkey. U.S. support for "moderate" fighters has been a centerpiece of war on ISIS, nearing its seventh month.


However, this support dates back further than the war on ISIS. As Adam Johnson reported in FAIR last week, "That the US is arming and training Syrian rebels has been well-documented for over two years, yet Western media have historically suffered from a strange collective amnesia when reporting this fact."




Jimmy Kimmel makes fun of 'antivaxxer' parents, reviving hate speech and bigotry on live TV


© Mike Adams/Natural News



Throughout U.S. history, certain selected groups of citizens have been subjected to extreme verbal, judicial and even physical abuse at the hands of bigoted oppressors. The historical abuse of African-Americans -- subjected to generations of abusive language and racism that still lingers today -- was villainously summed up with a bigoted hate speech label I dare not utter here.

Gay Americans were similarly subjected to the label of "f-@@-t," a hate-based derogatory slur invoked to demean a human being because of their sexual orientation. It was this campaign of verbal abuse and derogatory hate speech that helped give rise to violence against gays in America.


Importantly, every effort to demean and denigrate a selectively targeted class of citizens -- whether for their skin color, their sexual orientation or their beliefs -- has been preceded by a campaign of verbal abuse intended to dehumanize that targeted group. The invocation and use of bigoted, derogatory labels lays the social and cultural groundwork for not only discrimination but even actual violence committed against the groups being targeted.


Racism and hate speech are wrong. It is morally, politically and socially incorrect to use hate speech labels in a derogatory manner in a civilized society. These terms are hate-based forms of speech meant to emotionally hurt and demean targeted groups of innocent people. Yet, astonishingly, it has now emerged in America that it is socially acceptable to use precisely the same bigoted hate-speech language against another group: children who are damaged by vaccines (and children who are unvaccinated). This group is now being widely and aggressively disparaged with the hate-based term "anti-vaxxers."


Jimmy Kimmel has now popularized hate-based bigotry toward-vaccine damaged children and their families


In a stunning demonstration of demeaning hate speech targeting children who have suffered brain damage from vaccines, comedian Jimmy Kimmel unleashed a satire comedy hit piece that, fifty years ago, would have almost certainly seen Kimmel making fun of black people. Twenty years ago, he would have been making fun of gay people. But today, in 2015, Jimmy Kimmel directs his ignorance, bigotry and demeaning hate speech toward vaccine-damaged children who are now labeled "anti-vaxxers."



© Mike Adams/Natural News



In this astonishing display of bigoted hate speech, Jimmy Kimmel legitimizes the public's verbal abuse and aggressive bullying of children like Angelica Black, a child whose family was recently awarded a $2 million compensation by the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program after it was factually proven that vaccines caused severe, permanent brain damage that crippled Angelica Black for life.

Most people who watch Jimmy Kimmel have no knowledge that a vaccine court was created by the U.S. Congress to compensate families of children who are provably damaged by vaccines. The court would not exist at all if vaccines were completely "safe and effective" as factually ignorant newscasters and ill-informed comedians insist. In fact, the vaccine court has so far paid out almost $3 billion in damages to families whose children were severely damaged by vaccines.


In fact, this government document called the "Vaccine Injury Table" lists all the conditions (including seizures and death) which are "presumed to be caused by vaccines." It openly states that vaccine side effects can include "polio viral infections," injury, disability and death. This table is only a small selection of the side effects which are openly admitted on vaccine insert sheets like this one.


That same flu shot insert sheet, by the way, openly states, "...there have been no controlled trials adequately demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination."


Those who claim vaccines are all about SCIENCE, it turns out, are kidding themselves. For many vaccines, real science is utterly lacking.


African-Americans are especially susceptible to vaccine damage


Not only is Jimmy Kimmel using bigoted hate speech language to demean crippled children who were damaged by vaccines; he's also doing so in a manner that is utterly ignorant of the special risks posed to African-Americans by vaccines.


It was Dr. William Thompson, a top CDC scientist, who blew the whistle on the CDC's vaccine research fraud last year, going public with his confession that the CDC knowingly covered up data linking vaccines to an increased risk of autism in young African-American boys.


As detailed in this story, the CDC scientist openly admitted:


My name is William Thompson. I am a Senior Scientist with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, where I have worked since 1998. I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics. The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism. Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data were collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed.


This story, which was universally censored by the entire national media, shows that Jimmy Kimmel's attacks on vaccine-damaged children are, in fact, heightened attacks against black American babies.


Because of the increased risk of autism among African-Americans, there is a growing community of vaccine-damaged autistic black men in America. Jimmy Kimmel, a rich white guy, thinks that's downright hilarious. It's so damn funny, in fact, that Kimmel reaches for increased audience ratings by positioning vaccine-damaged babies -- who are disproportionately black -- as the butt of his jokes.


Here's a photo of just one of the young vaccine-damaged African-American boys that Jimmy Kimmel is laughing at:





Brutal eczema is one of many side affects that can be caused by vaccination.






Let's make fun of parents who are concerned about this possibly happening to their children. They're crazy!



To me, that doesn't look funny at all. It looks like an outrageous human tragedy that is being utterly ignored by the entire pharma-controlled media.

Jimmy Kimmel legitimizes the verbal abuse of children like Angelica Black, who was neurologically crippled by vaccines


Most newspapers dare not report the fact that children are routinely and systematically damaged by vaccines, out of fear of being strong-armed into retracting their true stories by Big Pharma operatives.


"The Charlotte Observer has done something that is quite rare: they have reported the truth about a child who received the recommended childhood vaccines, and then became brain damaged," reports Health Impact News. "Will this story remain on the Internet, or will it face the same fate as a recent Toronto Star investigative report about girls damaged by the Gardasil vaccine? The Star editors bowed to pro-Pharma censorship pressure, and removed the story from their website. It is currently still available (for now) on the Internet Archive website here."


As The Charlotte Observer newspaper reports, "As they started their family, Mooresville residents Theresa and Lucas Black dutifully got their children immunized, never doubting their doctor's word that vaccines are safe and necessary. ...But their faith in those promises was shaken in 2001, when their 3-month-old daughter, Angelica, developed life-threatening seizures and brain damage just three days after getting several vaccinations. The child's Charlotte neurologist diagnosed her with vaccine-related encephalopathy, or brain injury."


Despite the fact that the Black family is, by definition, a "pro-vaccine" family that dutifully got their children vaccinated, they have been subjected to verbal abuse and bullying for the simple reason that they were awarded compensation by the vaccine court.


"...Theresa Black said she has felt bullied in recent weeks by reaction to the California measles outbreak that has spread to 16 other states," reports the Observer.


In other words, merely being the parent of a child who has been permanently damaged by vaccines -- a fact proven in the courts -- now gets you subjected to bigoted hate speech attacks in America.


And who encourages this sort of verbal abuse against innocent children and families who have been put through absolute medical hell by unsafe products that destroyed the life of a little girl? People like Jimmy Kimmel.


Jimmy Kimmel thinks this brain-damaged little girl is a laughing matter. And because Angelica Black's brain is damaged, she is unable to respond to Jimmy Kimmel and call him the bigoted handicapped child basher he has now become.


That is why I have decided to speak up for children like Angelica, using the voice and platform I have been blessed with in my own mission to protect life, end human suffering and preserve the fundamental freedoms and human dignity that Gandhi spoke of when he warned about vaccines being a "fatal delusion" that must be resisted at all costs.



So let me publicly say what Angelica Black cannot: To Jimmy Kimmel and all who have engaged in bigoted hate speech targeting vaccine-damaged children, you now give credence to hate-filled derogatory labels through your verbal abuse of "anti-vaxxer" children and families.

You, Jimmy Kimmel, have legitimized the popular verbal abuse of brain-damaged children, the new subclass of vaccine victims who, unlike Martin Luther King, cannot speak for themselves to answer your bigotry and ignorance.


Jimmy Kimmel, this vaccine-damaged young girl is not a laughing matter; it is a MEDICAL TRAGEDY:





Zeda Pingel had neurological damage shortly after receiving a Gardisil vaccine. She is one of many girls forever altered after having the shot.



Jimmy Kimmel targets crippled children, reverses decades of progress and takes America back to the era of bigoted hate speech against innocent victims

With all the progress that has been made in America over the last fifty years, fighting back against ignorance and bigotry over skin color, religious affiliation and sexual orientation, Jimmy Kimmel has now set us back decades.


He has displayed on national television not only the fact the he and his entire staff are ignorant, bigoted child-haters, but that they also encourage bigoted hate speech against yet another targeted group of innocent victims.


Has America not yet learned that hate-based terms are unacceptable to use in a civilized society? Must people like Jimmy Kimmel now invent and publicize new terms of hatred and ignorance to unleash upon more groups of unfortunate victims who must now endure the public humiliation, bullying and death threats of the masses who have been given permission to engage in bigotry by watching shows like Jimmy Kimmel Live?


Jimmy Kimmel now encouraging violence against crippled "anti-vaxxer" children in the same way violence was committed against blacks and gays


Jimmy Kimmel, by scapegoating parents who question the safety and efficacy of vaccines, may inadvertently be encouraging violence against crippled "anti-vaxxer" children in the same way violence followed the denigrating language used against black and gays," radio host Robert Scott Bell told Natural News. Bell is the author of this article calling out Jimmy Kimmel for his verbal abuse of children who have been damaged by vaccines.


Vaccines, it turns out, are a form of medical violence against children for the simple reason that they provably cause extreme, permanent damage in many children year after year. But medical violence isn't the only violence that Jimmy Kimmel now seems to be promoting... he's also provoking individual acts of violence against so-called "anti-vaxxers" through his emotionally-charged, hate-filled rhetoric disguised as comedy.


Historically, it was the public tolerance of hate speech against African-Americans and gays that encouraged some people to engage in violent acts against them. After all, a group of people who are verbally belittled with derogatory and bigoted hate speech by public figures is an easy target for those with violent tendencies.


Over the years, countless violent attacks were committed against African-Americans and gays. The black community, in particular, suffered not merely from violence committed at the personal level, but even violence committed against them by the federal government.


The FBI, in particular, ran a seemingly endless campaign of threats, intimidation and violence against black America, even issuing a letter to Martin Luther King that called for the civil rights leader to commit suicide.


"There is but one way out for you," the FBI wrote MLK in a widely-publicized letter. "You better take it before your filthy, abnormal, fraudulent self is bared to the nation."


This language seemingly echoes the abusive comedy skit from Jimmy Kimmel Live, which positions informed, intelligent parents of healthy children as being "idiots" whose children are described as a threat to society. That the term "anti-vaxxer" refers to innocent children -- many who are permanently brain damaged by vaccines -- makes it even more of an outrageous example of hate speech. And now, thanks to efforts of bigoted haters of crippled children like Jimmy Kimmel, we may very well see outbreaks of violence committed against families of vaccine-damaged children.


It begs the question: Will Jimmy Kimmel and his staff at ABC then make fun of the homes of "anti-vaxxers" being set on fire? How about parents of vaccine-damaged children being beaten on the streets? Haven't these victims of unsafe vaccines already suffered enough through their own children being permanently brain-damaged? Must they also suffer the humiliation and verbal abuse of a society that denies their child was damaged by vaccines in the first place?


Jimmy Kimmel says it's okay to make fun of the families of children like this one, who was severely damaged by vaccines:





Severe eczema in yet another vaccine-damaged child.



It's time to take a stand and call for the resignation of Jimmy KimmelBigots like Jimmy Kimmel have no place in a society that has fought so hard against bigotry and racism over the last several generations.

Any TV show host that openly encourages ignorance, bigotry and hatred against crippled children who were damaged by unsafe vaccines is a show host who has no place on American television, period!


Think back to the Johnny Carson era. Johnny was a true classic, and he was a man who never would have made brain-damaged children the brunt of a bigoted satire skit. Carson honored people and celebrated their diversity. He had true compassion for children and radiated a sense of dignity and respect.


Jimmy Kimmel, on the other hand, is a bigot who uses innocent crippled children to boost his ratings by making them the butt of his cruel jokes. His ignorant bigotry and hate speech openly encourages verbal abuse and physical violence against innocent families and their children. Jimmy Kimmel quite literally thinks it's funny that vaccines damage thousands of children in America and cause seizures, brain damage and autism. Jimmy Kimmel thinks it is socially acceptable to call the parents of these children "idiots" and dignify the new hate speech label "anti-vaxxer" with nationwide publicity.


Jimmy Kimmel is no Johnny Carson. He is an embarrassment to America and a man who lacks basic human compassion for crippled children who have been provably harmed for life by unsafe vaccines.


ACTION ITEM: Demand ABC fire Jimmy Kimmel


Call ABC now at: 818- 460-7477


Use the ABC feedback form at:

http://abc.tv/1CloKbb


Write the Jimmy Kimmel Live show at:

6834 Hollywood Blvd.

Hollywood, CA 90028


This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://bit.ly/1xcsdoI.