US weaponry has habit of going AWOL

© www.sma-syria.com

Made in the USA, now lying on Syrian sand.

The reported that the Pentagon can't say what happened to more than $500 million worth of gear—including "small arms, ammunition, night-vision goggles, patrol boats, vehicles and other supplies"—it had given to the Yemeni government. The news comes as Al Qaeda and Iranian-backed groups vie to control the country following the collapse of the country's US-backed regime in January. The noted that the Pentagon has stopped further shipments of aid, but the damage has been done. "We have to assume it's completely compromised and gone," an anonymous legislative aide said.

This isn't the first time US military aid to allies has gone AWOL or wound up in the wrong hands. A few notable examples:

Libya: In late 2012, the reported that weapons from a US-approved deal had eventually gone to Islamic militants in Libya. The deal, which involved European weapons sent to Qatar as well as US weapons originally supplied to the United Arab Emirates, had been managed from the sidelines by the Obama administration.

Syria: More than once, American arms intended to help bolster the fight against ISIS in Syria and northern Iraq have ended up in the group's control. Last October, an airdrop of small arms was blown off target by the wind, according to the . ISIS quickly posted a video of its fighters going through crates of weapons attached to a parachute.

Iraq: American weapons supplied to the Iraqi army have also found their way to ISIS via theft and capture. And weapons meant for the Iraqi army have also gone to Shiite militias backed by Iran. This isn't a new problem: As much as 30 percent of the weapons the United States distributed to Iraqi forces between 2004 and early 2007 could not be accounted for.

Afghanistan: It's been widely documented that American forces invading Afghanistan in the wake of 9/11 had to face off against weapons the United States had once supplied to mujahideen fighters battling the Soviets in the '80s.

Somalia: In 2011, Wired reported that as much as half of the US-supplied arms given to Uganda and Burundi in support of the fight against al-Shabaab was winding up with the Somali militant group.

Comment: Perhaps this issue is one of many deflections on the part of the US to distance itself from being the creator of, provider for and underwriter of factions and ideologies unacceptable to the US public-at-large. Who in the MIC will spill the beans when the profits for arms sales (reaped from all sides and factions) continue to roll into the US coffers via US arms manufacturing.

What has the US learned over decades of destabilizing countries for its own selfish purposes? Provocate, create and pit factions against each other (including arming opposing militaries), sit back and further an empirical agenda at a profit while removing rival or problematic elements in absentia. If that is not the case and given the US just may not be that savvy, then it all boils down to exceedingly exceptional incompetence at its very finest.